IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/seapas/y2025i37p31-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Property Restitution in Romania: Administrative Challanges and Compliance with The Case Law of The European Court of Human Rights - Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Miklós-Csaba GYÖRGYJAKAB

    (European Parliament)

Abstract

This case study examines a method used to bypass legal regulations on the restitution of properties seized during Romania's communist regime. Since the regime's fall, Romania has faced criticism from international bodies, including the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), for delays or failure to complete property restitution. The ECHR has issued several rulings and recommendations urging the Romanian state to uphold the rights of those affected by these seizures. From 2009-2023, administrative measures aimed at completing restitution were insufficient, facing bureaucratic delays and resource shortages. Despite constitutional commitments to human rights, implementation often lags. The ECHR has stressed that without political will, the restitution process will not be completed. Romania continues to struggle with fulfilling these commitments, with public administrations showing reluctance and questions about judicial independence. This study offers original insights into the challenges of property restitution in Romania, emphasizing the need for political will, efficient administration, and judicial independence. It highlights the relevance of addressing legal and administrative barriers and proposes practical solutions to fulfill international obligations and protect citizens' rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Miklós-Csaba GYÖRGYJAKAB, 2025. "Property Restitution in Romania: Administrative Challanges and Compliance with The Case Law of The European Court of Human Rights - Case Study," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, vol. 0(37), pages 31-37, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2025:i:37:p:31-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/SPAS_37_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://spas.seaopenresearch.eu/articles/spas_37_4.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2025:i:37:p:31-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.