Author
Listed:
- Rylan Graham
(University of Calgary)
- Jenna Dutton
(University of Calgary)
Abstract
Though remote work has become a necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic, the rise of office vacancy is not a new issue to Calgary. Economic booms and busts are mirrored by accompanying levels of construction, occupancy and vacancy. The most recent recession brought an unprecedented loss of jobs and subsequent partial or complete vacancy of buildings in Calgary’s Central Business District (CBD). This new reality led to the agglomeration and elimination of businesses and re-evaluation of the necessity of office space and its associated costs. Trends in the knowledge economy and ways of working over the preceding decades have coincided with associated vacancy of office space that is no longer adaptable to the changing needs and demands of office design. These patterns have reduced the demand of certain office stock and highlighted limits on its versatility and capacity to be repurposed, making a certain proportion of buildings relatively obsolete. Office conversion, being changing the use or uses of a building, has also become increasingly arduous with updates in planning rules and building, energy and safety codes. When considering conversion of office to other uses the standard solution usually discussed is office to residential conversion. While this may present as the optimal approach in some cases, there are many limitations when it comes to converting buildings. Since the economic downturn some projects have been piloted by the City of Calgary to facilitate office conversion including the Centre City Enterprise Area. While some successes have come from these relatively short-term solutions they have been limited in addressing the full extent of the situation. These small-scale interventions were successful in reducing customer costs and timelines however did not result in recommendations of longer-term solutions for widespread changes. Complex problems such as office vacancy in Calgary require comprehensive, adaptable and innovative strategies. To update and improve the existing processes to more simply enable office conversion or adaptation there is a necessity to clearly outline the role of everyone involved, the limitations, and the potential options that may exist. In this regard it is not simply the question of the use of land and the building footprint but also the building owner, the surrounding stakeholders including business associations, municipal government, provincial government and a variety of other related parties. This paper examines the present state of office vacancy in downtown Calgary; looks at barriers to office conversion, limitations in existing processes and structures and potential policy considerations, drawing upon best practices from other jurisdictions. Finally, it will conclude with a series of policy recommendations and mechanisms which may enable efficiency and innovation in addressing the existing office stock.
Suggested Citation
Rylan Graham & Jenna Dutton, 2021.
"Obsolescence as an Opportunity: The Role of Adaptive Reuse in Calgary's Office Market,"
SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 14(4), February.
Handle:
RePEc:clh:briefi:v:14:y:2021:i:4
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Ian Chng & Jonathan Reades & Phil Hubbard, 2024.
"Planning deregulation as solution to the housing crisis: The affordability, amenity and adequacy of Permitted Development in London,"
Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 961-978, May.
- Jessica Ferm & Ben Clifford & Patricia Canelas & Nicola Livingstone, 2021.
"Emerging problematics of deregulating the urban: The case of permitted development in England,"
Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2040-2058, August.
- Nancy Holman & Alessandra Mossa & Erica Pani, 2018.
"Planning, value(s) and the market: An analytic for “what comes next?â€,"
Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(3), pages 608-626, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clh:briefi:v:14:y:2021:i:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bev Dahlby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spcalca.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.