IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cje/issued/v14y1981i4p708-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Measuring the Social Opportunity Cost of Permanent and Temporary Employment: A Reply

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn P. Jenkins
  • Chun-Yan Kuo

Abstract

Two major points were raised in this Journal by DeWolf and Sugden (1979) in their comment on our paper (1978) concerning the measurement of the opportunity costs of permanent and temporary employment. Clarification of these issues and their implications is central to the estimation of the social opportunity cost (soc) of labour and its application in the evaluation of public sector sponsored investments. First, DeWolf and Sugden contend that the labour market in Cape Breton during 1972-4 could not be in long-run equilibrium with other labour markets in Canada when the proportion of time spent unemployed in the temporary sector was on average as high as 46 per cent, and the soc of temporary jobs created in the project should not be greater than the market wage rate. Secondly, they argue that the migration response to either the creation of jobs by a project or the displacement of workers at a firm would not be rapid or large enough to bring about a return to the initial equilibrium in the labour market within a relevant length of time.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn P. Jenkins & Chun-Yan Kuo, 1981. "On Measuring the Social Opportunity Cost of Permanent and Temporary Employment: A Reply," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 14(4), pages 708-712, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cje:issued:v:14:y:1981:i:4:p:708-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0008-4085%28198111%2914%3A4%3C708%3AOMTSOC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J0 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cje:issued:v:14:y:1981:i:4:p:708-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Werner Antweiler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.