IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cii/cepiie/2019-q4-160-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who's winning the low-carbon innovation race? An assessment of countries' leadership in renewable energy technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Clément Bonnet
  • Emmanuel Hache
  • Gondia Sokhna Seck
  • Marine Simoën
  • Samuel Carcanague

Abstract

Intellectual property is a central issue in climate negotiations. On the one hand, it shapes and encourages innovation in low-carbon technologies. On the other hand, it can reduce access to these technologies by giving patent holders market power. We analyse the interactions between climate negotiations and the acquisition of renewable energy technology patents. First, we present the history of climate negotiations, emphasizing the role of technologies. Second, we conduct an empirical analysis aimed at determining which countries could be considered leaders in renewable energy technologies (RETs). Major changes were observed in the geographical distribution of low-carbon innovation during the 2000s, foreshadowing a reorganization of the geopolitical balances of innovation in renewable energies.

Suggested Citation

  • Clément Bonnet & Emmanuel Hache & Gondia Sokhna Seck & Marine Simoën & Samuel Carcanague, 2019. "Who's winning the low-carbon innovation race? An assessment of countries' leadership in renewable energy technologies," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 160, pages 31-42.
    • Handle: RePEc:cii:cepiie:2019-q4-160-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2110701719300332
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chanyuan Liu & Long Xin & Jinye Li & Huaping Sun, 2022. "The Impact of Renewable Energy Technology Innovation on Industrial Green Transformation and Upgrading: Beggar Thy Neighbor or Benefiting Thy Neighbor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Zhang, Zixuan & Chen, Huaichao, 2022. "Dynamic interaction of renewable energy technological innovation, environmental regulation intensity and carbon pressure: Evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 420-430.
    3. Mingliang Zhao & Fangyi Liu & Yingjie Song & Jiangbo Geng, 2020. "Impact of Air Pollution Regulation and Technological Investment on Sustainable Development of Green Economy in Eastern China: Empirical Analysis with Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Jarosław Kaczmarek & Konrad Kolegowicz & Wojciech Szymla, 2022. "Restructuring of the Coal Mining Industry and the Challenges of Energy Transition in Poland (1990–2020)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-48, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Patent data; Energy transition; Renewable energy technology; Innovation; International relations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cii:cepiie:2019-q4-160-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepiifr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.