IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v70y2017i18p21-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effiziente Spezialisierung in Ricardianischer Produktion: Was lehrt das Beispiel von Tuch und Wein?

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfram F. Richter

Abstract

Im ifo Schnelldienst 9/2017 wurde Ricardos bahnbrechende Leistungen für die moderne Volkswirtschaftslehre gewürdigt. Wolfram F. Richter, Technische Universität Dortmund, setzt sich in seinem Kommentar mit dem Zahlenbeispiel in Ricardos Theorie komparativer Kosten auseinander und fragt, wie sich eine effiziente Ricardianische Produktion charakterisieren lässt, wenn nicht nur zwei Länder und zwei Güter betrachtet werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfram F. Richter, 2017. "Effiziente Spezialisierung in Ricardianischer Produktion: Was lehrt das Beispiel von Tuch und Wein?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(18), pages 21-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:70:y:2017:i:18:p:21-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2017-18-richter-ricardo-2017-09-28.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfram F. Richter & Joachim Rosenmüller, 2012. "Efficient Specialization in Ricardian Production," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 13(2), pages 117-126, May.
    2. Ronald W. Jones, 1961. "Comparative Advantage and the Theory of Tariffs: A Multi-Country, Multi-Commodity Model," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 28(3), pages 161-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ronald W. Jones, 2018. "On Blending Competitive Trade Models," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: International Trade Theory and Competitive Models Features, Values, and Criticisms, chapter 19, pages 319-361, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Hideo Sato, 2024. "An input trade model with Keynesian unemployment: Bridging a gap between trade theory and international Input–Output analysis," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 282-305, July.
    3. Henry Thompson, 2023. "Multilateral Comparative Advantage," Auburn Economics Working Paper Series auwp2023-07, Department of Economics, Auburn University.
    4. Baboo M Nowbutsing, 2012. "Experiments in International Economics," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 4(2), pages 75-86.
    5. Alan V Deardorff, 2011. "How Robust is Comparative Advantage?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Robert M Stern (ed.), Comparative Advantage, Growth, And The Gains From Trade And Globalization A Festschrift in Honor of Alan V Deardorff, chapter 17, pages 183-195, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Sato, Hideo & Assistant, JHET, 2021. "Graham’s Theory of International Values Revisited: A Ricardian Trade Model with Link Commodities," OSF Preprints h84yp, Center for Open Science.
    7. Costinot, Arnaud & Komunjer, Ivana, 2006. "What Good Do Countries Trade? New Ricardian Predictions," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt9t9818ng, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    8. Hideo Sato, 2022. "A multi‐country, multi‐commodity Ricardian trade model with link commodities and Keynesian unemployment," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 441-465, May.
    9. Unjung Whang, 2017. "Structural Transformation and Comparative Advantage: Implications for Small Open Economies," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 743-763, April.
    10. Luanping Zhou & Bruce I. Iormom & Muhammad Salman Azhar & Michael Yao‐Ping Peng, 2022. "Domestic inflation, exchange rate, and aggregate import demand nexus in Nigeria: New evidence from cointegrating regression," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4154-4165, October.
    11. Ronald W. Jones, 1980. "Comparative and Absolute Advantage," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 116(III), pages 235-260, September.
    12. Arnaud Costinot, 2009. "An Elementary Theory of Comparative Advantage," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1165-1192, July.
    13. Jean-Jacques Nowak & Sylvain Petit & Mondher Sahli, 2010. "Tourism And Globalization: The International Division Of Tourism Production," Post-Print hal-01831527, HAL.
    14. Alan V. Deardorff, 2014. "Local comparative advantage: Trade costs and the pattern of trade," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 10(1), pages 9-35, March.
    15. Jonathan Eaton & Samuel Kortum, 2012. "Putting Ricardo to Work," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 65-90, Spring.
    16. Ronald W. Jones, 2010. "Production Possibility Frontiers," Chapters, in: Mark Blaug & Peter Lloyd (ed.), Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics, chapter 33, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Wan, Henry Jr., 2005. "Fragmented trade and manufacturing services--Examples for a non-convex general equilibrium," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 273-295.
    18. Eric W. Bond, 2021. "Tariff pass‐through in the middle products model," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 17(1), pages 20-30, March.
    19. Jones, Ronald W., 2010. "Art works in international trade theory," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 64-74, January.
    20. Hikoya Ichikawa, 1973. "Factor Proportions, Human Capital and Comparative Advantage," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 49(1), pages 104-125, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Komparativer Vorteil; Produktivität; Arbeitsteilung; Außenhandel; Außenwirtschaftstheorie; Freihandel; Handelsliberalisierung; Außenwirtschaftspolitik; Innovationsdiffusion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • F43 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Economic Growth of Open Economies
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:70:y:2017:i:18:p:21-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.