IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v70y2017i12p87-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Merkantilismus im Gewand des Freihandels? Evidenz aus einer Expertenbefragung

Author

Listed:
  • Dorine Boumans
  • Martin Braml
  • Gabriel Felbermayr
  • Federico Rogai

Abstract

Im ersten Quartal 2017 wurde beim ifo World Economic Survey die Sonderfrage nach den Wirkungen des Freihandels auf das Land, in dem der befragte Experte ansässig ist, gestellt. Knapp drei Viertel der befragten Experten bewerten den Freihandel als positiv; gerade einmal 15% halten ihn für negativ. Die positive Einschätzung wird dann wahrscheinlicher, wenn das Land des befragten Experten einen Handelsbilanzüberschuss hat, und weniger wahrscheinlich, wenn das Gegenteil der Fall ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorine Boumans & Martin Braml & Gabriel Felbermayr & Federico Rogai, 2017. "Merkantilismus im Gewand des Freihandels? Evidenz aus einer Expertenbefragung," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(12), pages 87-90, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:70:y:2017:i:12:p:87-90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2017-12-boumans-etal-wes-freihandel-2017-06-29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Freihandel; Merkantilismus; Handelsbilanz; Wirkungsanalyse;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:70:y:2017:i:12:p:87-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.