IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v58y2005i01p40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eine ökonomische Nachbetrachtung der Münchner Hochhausabstimmung

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Eichhorn
  • Marco Sahm
  • Frank Westermann

Abstract

Am 21. November 2004 haben sich die Münchner in einem Bürgerentscheid mit knapper Mehrheit dafür ausgesprochen, die Maximalhöhe für neue Hochhäuser auf 100 Meter zu begrenzen. Stark verkürzt hießen die Alternativen bei dieser Wahl: "Hochhäuser" oder "keine Hochhäuser". Aus ökonomischer Betrachtung greift diese Sichtweise zu kurz. Prof. Frank Westermann, Christoph Eichhorn und Marco Sahm, Universität München, zeigen, dass eine vernünftigere Fragestellung mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit zu anderen Ergebnissen geführt hätte.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Eichhorn & Marco Sahm & Frank Westermann, 2005. "Eine ökonomische Nachbetrachtung der Münchner Hochhausabstimmung," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 58(01), pages 1-40, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:58:y:2005:i:01:p:40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2005_1_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Wohnungsbau; Bürgerbeteiligung; Bayern; München;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L85 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Real Estate Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:58:y:2005:i:01:p:40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.