IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifofor/v19y2018i03p10-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Lessons from the Recent UK Debate about Universal Basic Income

Author

Listed:
  • Malcolm Torry

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm Torry, 2018. "Some Lessons from the Recent UK Debate about Universal Basic Income," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 19(03), pages 10-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:03:p:10-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/CESifo-Forum-2018-3-torry-unconditrional-basic-income-september.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torry, Malcolm, 2014. "Research note: a feasible way to implement a Citizen’s Income," EUROMOD Working Papers EM17/14, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gubello, Michele, 2024. "Social trust and the support for universal basic income," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Bonomi Bezzo, Franco, 2021. "Universal Independence Income. A EUROMOD Utopian Simulation in the UK," EUROMOD Working Papers EM3/21, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Torry, Malcolm, 2020. "The role of research in the basic income debate in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108532, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Martin Josh, 2016. "Universal Credit to Basic Income: A Politically Feasible Transition?," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 97-131, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:03:p:10-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.