IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifodre/v08y2001i05ps.18-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hat die sächsische Industrie ihre Spielräume für mehr Innovationen genutzt? : Ergebnisse des ifo Innovationstests 1999/2000

Author

Listed:
  • Heinz Schmalholz
  • Horst Penzkofer

Abstract

Der Beitrag geht der Frage nach, inwieweit die ostdeutsche Industrie und insbesondere die sächsischen Unternehmen die im Jahr 2000 höheren Verkaufserlöse und die verbesserte Ertragslage für eine Erhöhung der Innovationsanstrengungen genutzt haben. Die Befunde deuten darauf hin, dass bisher kein spürbarer Innovationsschub eingetreten ist. Das ist nicht unbedenklich, da innovationsstarke Unternehmen eindeutig wachstums- und ertragsstärker sind und häufiger die Beschäftigung ausweiten.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinz Schmalholz & Horst Penzkofer, 2001. "Hat die sächsische Industrie ihre Spielräume für mehr Innovationen genutzt? : Ergebnisse des ifo Innovationstests 1999/2000," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 8(05), pages .18-35, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifodre:v:08:y:2001:i:05:p:s.18-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifodb_2001_5_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sachsen; Industrie; Investition; Forschung; Verarbeitendes Gewerbe; Unternehmen;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L00 - Industrial Organization - - General - - - General
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifodre:v:08:y:2001:i:05:p:s.18-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.