IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifodic/v8y2010i02p35-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Quality of Long-term Care

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Mor

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Mor, 2010. "Improving the Quality of Long-term Care," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 8(02), pages 35-39, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifodic:v:8:y:2010:i:02:p:35-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/dicereport210-forum6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dana B. Mukamel & William D. Spector & Jacqueline S. Zinn & Lynn Huang & David L. Weimer & Ann Dozier, 2007. "Nursing Homes' Response to the Nursing Home Compare Report Card," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 62(4), pages 218-225.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ces:ifodic:v:8:y:2010:i:2:p:14566962 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Justin Goodson & Wooseung Jang, 2008. "Assessing nursing home care quality through Bayesian networks," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 382-392, December.
    3. Vincent Mor, 2010. "Improving the Quality of Long-term Care," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 8(2), pages 35-39, 07.
    4. Jeongyoung Park & Rachel M. Werner, 2011. "Changes in the relationship between nursing home financial performance and quality of care under public reporting," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(7), pages 783-801, July.
    5. Greenfield, David & Hinchcliff, Reece & Pawsey, Marjorie & Westbrook, Johanna & Braithwaite, Jeffrey, 2013. "The public disclosure of accreditation information in Australia: Stakeholder perceptions of opportunities and challenges," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 151-159.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifodic:v:8:y:2010:i:02:p:35-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.