IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/epofor/v25y2024i04p20-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Defense Spending: Trade-Offs and Consequences of Non-Alignment

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Marsh
  • Bruno Oliveira Martins
  • Jocelyn Mawdsley

Abstract

European states are not aligned in their military spending priorities, and for this reason, simply increasing national defense spending will not automatically translate into higher common EU industrial and operational capacity As long as EU and member state priorities remain unaligned, the risks of wasting growing military funds are considerable and should be more widely debated at the political level There are four main defense risks emerging from this context: worsened fragmentation of the European defense industrial base; competition between different European companies for components and raw materials; mismatch between operational needs and industrial supply; and challenges to the definition of a common strategic autonomy The economic impacts of an increasing militarization of commercial and civilian industry and increased challenges for green transition should also be considered Risk mitigation strategies should favor efforts promoting strategic alignment and political convergence rather than simply agreeing on higher national expenditure targets

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Marsh & Bruno Oliveira Martins & Jocelyn Mawdsley, 2024. "European Defense Spending: Trade-Offs and Consequences of Non-Alignment," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 25(04), pages 20-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:epofor:v:25:y:2024:i:04:p:20-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/econpol-forum-2024-4-marsh-martins-mawdsley-european-defense.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:epofor:v:25:y:2024:i:04:p:20-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.