IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cem/jaecon/v20y2017n2p271-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coupled vs. decoupled subsidies with heterogeneous firms in general equilibrium

Author

Listed:
  • Mark J. Gibson

    (Washington State University)

  • Jeff Luckstead

    (University of Arkansas)

Abstract

We develop a competitive general equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms and endogenous entry and exit to contrast the effects of coupled and decoupled subsidies. Unlike coupled subsidies, decoupled subsidies are not tied to a producer’s level of output, so they are thought to be less distortive. We challenge this view by proving that, in a model with endogenous TFP, coupled subsidies have no effect on TFP while decoupled subsidies have a negative effect. Moreover, our numerical experiments show that, for a given level of government expenditure, decoupled subsidies can lower welfare more than coupled subsidies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark J. Gibson & Jeff Luckstead, 2017. "Coupled vs. decoupled subsidies with heterogeneous firms in general equilibrium," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 20, pages 271-282, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cem:jaecon:v:20:y:2017:n:2:p:271-282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ucema.edu.ar/publicaciones/download/volume20/gibson.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. You-hua Chen & Zhuang Zhang & Ashok K. Mishra, 2023. "A flexible and efficient hybrid agricultural subsidy design for promoting food security and safety," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Devadoss, Stephen & Gibson, Mark J. & Luckstead, Jeff, 2016. "The Impact of Agricultural Subsidies on the Corn Market with Farm Heterogeneity and Endogenous Entry and Exit," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-20, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    policy distortions; firm heterogeneity; productivity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O4 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
    • L0 - Industrial Organization - - General
    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
    • L5 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cem:jaecon:v:20:y:2017:n:2:p:271-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valeria Dowding (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cemaaar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.