IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ceh/journl/y2024v9p256-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prostitution in Bulgaria during the 19th, 20th and 21st Centuries – from Economic Activity to Social Parasitism

Author

Listed:
  • Georgi Petrunov

    (University of National and World Economy - Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

The text focuses on the way in which the Bulgarian state behaves toward prostitution in a historical perspective. Emphasis is placed on the economic facets associated with prostitution and the influence of political factors in classifying an activity as economic or not. Prostitution was not unknown in the Bulgarian territories before the Liberation. However, the social and economic transformations that took place in the country after 1878 led to its expansion. Due to the significant economic interest associated with brothels, the concept of regulation of prostitution was adopted. At the dawn of the 20th century, it was recognized as a profession, with entrepreneurs eager to invest in building facilities where this economic activity could take place. In several major cities, authorities are developing regulations to manage prostitution, detailing the conditions for conducting such work and the fees that will be collected by the municipality. Prostitution functioned under these conditions in Bulgaria for four decades until the early 1920s. At that time, largely due to public disapproval, legislation was enacted to prohibit brothels. However, during the interwar period, policies towards prostitution remained tacitly permissive. In the socialist state, prostitution is considered a shameful legacy of the bourgeois-capitalist way of life, and the activity of prostitutes is treated as unproductive and socially useless, and in that way it is considered a form of “social parasitism and laziness”. Despite the shifts in political and economic systems since 1989, this policy remained in effect until 2022, even though its inadequacy given the democratic conditions and policies of other EU countries. The analysis indicates that the state's perception of prostitution is filtered through concepts of labor and economic benefit. However, ideological and political factors influence the way this labor will be interpreted. The moral dilemmas surrounding the sale of human bodies also affect the legal status of prostitution in society. In the current situation, politicians often hesitate to initiate discussions on policies that address phenomena deemed immoral. The result is that in Bulgaria, the topic of prostitution remains taboo, it's widely acknowledged yet rarely discussed. This silence predominantly benefits criminal activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgi Petrunov, 2024. "Prostitution in Bulgaria during the 19th, 20th and 21st Centuries – from Economic Activity to Social Parasitism," Proceedings of the Centre for Economic History Research, Centre for Economic History Research, vol. 9, pages 256-268, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ceh:journl:y:2024:v:9:p:256-268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://csii.bg/series/2024-9/pdf/21-Petrunov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://csii.bg/series/2024-9/html/22-Petrunov.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public policies; state regulation; prostitution; economic activity; political influence;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • N43 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - Europe: Pre-1913
    • N44 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - Europe: 1913-
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ceh:journl:y:2024:v:9:p:256-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivan Roussev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csiisbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.