IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cdh/commen/438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Outcomes in the Canadian Health Sector: Driving Better Value from Healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Veillard

    (The World Bank)

  • Omid Fekri
  • Irfan Dhalla

    (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Studies)

  • Niek Klazinga

    (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development)

Abstract

While Canada has a well-established tradition of transparency and accountability for health-system performance comparisons, few measures of outcomes are reported. In this Commentary, we examine what outcomes measurement is; the state of outcomes measurement in Canada; and offer recommendations so that the generation of better information on health system outcomes can help achieve greater value in the health sector. Outcome measures help to better understand how effectively the health system achieves its goals, support better decision-making by relating investment decisions to outcomes, and better match the delivery of health and social services to the evolving needs of populations and patients. From a research perspective, outcome measures help better understand how policy interventions and healthcare services can contribute to achieving targeted outcomes and their role in the broader social determinants of health. And from a democratic perspective, publicizing outcome measures can empower patients, families and communities to engage in the policy debate about which outcomes matter most and at what cost – and in the ways healthcare should be delivered. Among our key recommendations: • The federal and provincial governments should complement current data with outcome measures of relevance to patients, clinicians, system managers and policy practitioners. In particular, patient-reported outcome measures and patient reported experience measures should augment datasets currently available in panCanadian clinical registries. • Organizations with a mandate to report publicly on health-system performance, such as the Canadian Institute for Health information and provincial health quality councils, should collect outcomes data and report publicly on outcomes, filling current gaps in outcomes measurement and public reporting. The ultimate yardstick of success, however, will not be the quantity and accuracy of Canadian healthcare outcomes data, but rather how this information is put to use by clinicians, system managers and policymakers to advance health system goals. Better measurement can only take us so far. More critical is how the data will be aggregated, analyzed, risk-adjusted and, most importantly, how public policy and other interventions will incent professionals to improve outcomes and patients to demand better outcomes and value from the healthcare sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Veillard & Omid Fekri & Irfan Dhalla & Niek Klazinga, 2015. "Measuring Outcomes in the Canadian Health Sector: Driving Better Value from Healthcare," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 438, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cdhowe.org/public-policy-research/measuring-outcomes-canadian-health-sector-driving-better-value-healthcare
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Poulin, Laura I.L. & Skinner, Mark W. & Hanlon, Neil, 2020. "Rural gerontological health: Emergent questions for research, policy and practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. Colin Busby & Åke Blomqvist, 2017. "The Paradox of Productivity, Technology, and Innovation in Canadian Healthcare," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 480, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Health Policy; Health Outcomes;

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristine Gray (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.