IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2024v6ip191-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences Between Generations: The Sustainable Characteristics Of Generation Z

Author

Listed:
  • BEJAN BRINDUSA MARIANA

    (BABES-BOLYAI UNIVERSITY OF CLUJ-NAPOCA, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING DEPARTMENT, CLUJ-NAPOCA, ROMANIA)

  • POP CIPRIAN MARCEL

    (BABES-BOLYAI UNIVERSITY OF CLUJ-NAPOCA, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING DEPARTMENT, CLUJ-NAPOCA, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Our society's growth and evolution now place a strong emphasis on sustainability. Sustainable practices ensure a brighter future for future generations in a world with finite resources and adverse environmental effects. Of course, everyone's participation is necessary if there is any prospect for a better world. However, with time, studies have revealed that youngsters are more engaged in neighborhood activities, social responsibility initiatives, and sustainable practices. Starting from these considerations, the article aims to outline a profile of Generation Z, taking into account their constant concern for protecting the environment. Thus, we analyze their attitude towards recycling, their behavior distinct from previous generations, and the factors contributing to shaping this behavior. From a methodological perspective, for this research, we conducted a quantitative survey-based study among members of Generation Z. Following the statistical analysis, the results confirmed our hypothesis that young people exhibit proactive behavior, demonstrating a willingness to engage in the life of their community and participate in actions aimed at conserving the environment. Likewise, through this research, we were able to identify the materials most frequently recycled by young people, as well as the significance of the location for recycling.

Suggested Citation

  • Bejan Brindusa Mariana & Pop Ciprian Marcel, 2024. "Differences Between Generations: The Sustainable Characteristics Of Generation Z," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 191-198, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2024:v:6i:p:191-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2024-06,%20Volumul%20I/22_Bejan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnold Tukker & Bart Jansen, 2006. "Environmental Impacts of Products: A Detailed Review of Studies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 10(3), pages 159-182, July.
    2. Lavinia Popescu & Adela Sorinela Safta, 2024. "Sustainability From The Perspective Of Electromagnetic Waves - Global System For Mobile Communication," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 249-258, October.
    3. Singh, Ranjit & Sibi, P.S., 2023. "E-loyalty formation of Generation Z: Personal characteristics and social influences," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 3-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Attahiru, Yusuf Babangida & Aziz, Md. Maniruzzaman A. & Kassim, Khairul Anuar & Shahid, Shamsuddin & Wan Abu Bakar, Wan Azelee & NSashruddin, Thanwa Filza & Rahman, Farahiyah Abdul & Ahamed, Mohd Imra, 2019. "A review on green economy and development of green roads and highways using carbon neutral materials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 600-613.
    2. Angelica Pianegonda & Sara Favargiotti & Marco Ciolli, 2022. "Rural–Urban Metabolism: A Methodological Approach for Carbon-Positive and Circular Territories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Mária Csutora & Ágnes Zsóka, 2011. "Maximizing the Efficiency of Greenhouse Gas Related Consumer Policy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 67-90, March.
    4. Jui-Che Tu & Yukari Nagai & Min-Chieh Shih, 2018. "Establishing Design Strategies and an Assessment Tool of Home Appliances to Promote Sustainable Behavior for the New Poor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Colin M. Rose & Julia A. Stegemann, 2018. "From Waste Management to Component Management in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Chad M. Baum & Christian Gross, 2017. "Sustainability policy as if people mattered: developing a framework for environmentally significant behavioral change," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 53-95, April.
    7. Kristin Jürkenbeck & Achim Spiller, 2020. "Consumers’ Evaluation of Stockfree-Organic Agriculture—A Segmentation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Yosuke Shigetomi & Keisuke Nansai & Shigemi Kagawa & Susumu Tohno, 2016. "Influence of income difference on carbon and material footprints for critical metals: the case of Japanese households," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Yingjie Lai & Chaemoon Yoo & Xiaomin Zhou & Younghwan Pan, 2023. "Elements of Food Service Design for Low-Carbon Tourism-Based on Dine-In Tourist Behavior and Attitudes in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Yusuf Opeyemi Akinwale, 2022. "Awareness and Perceptions of University Students in the Business College towards Energy Savings and Renewable Energy Sources in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 470-476, May.
    11. Dominik Wiedenhofer & Marina Fischer-Kowalski, 2015. "Achieving Absolute Decoupling? Comparing Biophysical Scenarios and Macro-economic Modelling Results. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 86," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 57895.
    12. Ioanna Zerinou & Evangelia Karasmanaki & Konstantinos Ioannou & Veronika Andrea & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2020. "Energy Saving: Views and Attitudes among Primary School Students and Their Parents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Taiwo Temitope Lasisi & Kayode Kolawole Eluwole & Uju Violet Alola & Luigi Aldieri & Concetto Paolo Vinci & Andrew Adewale Alola, 2021. "Do Tourism Activities and Urbanization Drive Material Consumption in the OECD Countries? A Quantile Regression Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Sarah Olson & Małgorzata Szafraniec & Jukka Heinonen & Áróra Árnadóttir, 2024. "Concerned about Climate Change and Ready to Take Action? An Analysis of the Pro-Climate Actions Individuals Are Motivated to Take to Lower Their Carbon Footprints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-29, August.
    15. Tiansheng Yang & Ken Peattie & Jean-Paul Skeete & Nicole Koenig-Lewis, 2024. "Navigating Transitions: How Electric Vehicle Sharing Is Shaping Sustainable Mobility in Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Maria Csutora, 2012. "One More Awareness Gap? The Behaviour–Impact Gap Problem," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 145-163, March.
    17. Bernhard Steubing & Arjan de Koning & Stefano Merciai & Arnold Tukker, 2022. "How do carbon footprints from LCA and EEIOA databases compare? A comparison of ecoinvent and EXIOBASE," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1406-1422, August.
    18. Qing Liu & Zhen Yan & Jiehong Zhou, 2017. "Consumer Choices and Motives for Eco-Labeled Products in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, February.
    19. Tobias Engelmann & Daniel Fischer & Marianne Lörchner & Jaya Bowry & Holger Rohn, 2019. "“Doing” Sustainability Assessment in Different Consumption and Production Contexts—Lessons from Case Study Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Muhammad Adil Rauf & Bruce Frayne, 2024. "Affordable Housing – Challenges and Constraints for Local Governance in Canada," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(1), pages 103-103, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2024:v:6i:p:191-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ecobici Nicolae to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.