Author
Abstract
The monitoring of the public health system, of patients, can be effective through a careful contribution of family doctors, who have the major goal of preventing communicable diseases on the one hand, and chronic diseases on the other, through a transparent assessment made through the patient file, completed by computer, simply called "corona form". We thus understand that the role of the National Health Insurance House is to provide the settlement sent by the family doctors, automatically and completely (through SIU). This is how it can be explained, the important role of family doctors, which is reflected through a simplified and direct balance, doctors-patients-providers of medical services, respectively the National House of Health Insurance. Will this be a reason to choose a public health system or a private one? The legislation established for the introduction of co-payment must become a legal framework of ease in the health system, so that all insured persons can identify their own system of medical services, used both from a financial point of view, but also necessary. Any health system must be identified by universal access of the entire population to medical services, state or private, to benefit from quality and efficient medical services, to have equity for all members of society, regardless of age, sex, religion, social status, who may have the financial ability to pay. Solidarity in the health system remains in fact the principle that must characterize a healthy system, for society regardless of social, economic, political, demographic problems. Overall, we must consider that the health system with diversified funding ensures the safety of any patient, with care based on both evidence and from an ethical point of view, confidential and with transparent compensation possibilities, avoiding possible cases of malpractice.
Suggested Citation
Toma Gilda, 2023.
"The Role Of Co-Payment In Changing The Health System In Romania,"
Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 125-129, April.
Handle:
RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2023:v:2:p:125-129
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2023:v:2:p:125-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ecobici Nicolae to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.