IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2015v6specialp388-393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study Of Mission Statement Of Romania Universities

Author

Listed:
  • LIVIU NEAMTU

    (CONSTANTIN BRANCUSI UNIVERSITY FROM TARGU JIU)

  • ADINA CLAUDIA NEAMTU

    (CONSTANTIN BRANCUSI UNIVERSITY FROM TARGU JIU)

Abstract

Amid cultural-educational models, the European countries have developed in educational and learning systems a totally wrong vision and mission of the role they have as systems and institutions subordinated to the overall development of society. In most cases in European countries, defining the mission of education and its institutions mission was carried out from "inside" the system. The system has considered what is good for society or not, which should receive this society, or what he wants it. There are four vision models of the role of higher education institutions, on how they can fulfill their role and about the type of organizational management: university-faculty, university-school of thought, university-knowledge center, and university-study center. European vision and strategic direction lead to a type of university-knowledge platform that subscribe to main objective of the Lisbon Strategy of the European Union, which was considered the project Europe of knowledge. The intention of main universities in Romania is one of alignment with the principles of a Europe of knowledge by declaring a suitable academic mission but enforcement is difficult if not impossible in the current legislation and professional-type models inherited from the socialist mentality.

Suggested Citation

  • Liviu Neamtu & Adina Claudia Neamtu, 2015. "Comparative Study Of Mission Statement Of Romania Universities," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 388-393, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2015:v:6special:p:388-393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2015-Special%20ECOTREND/64_Neamtu%20L,%20Neamtu%20A.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Banchoff, 2002. "Institutions, Inertia and European Union Research Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laurent R. Bergé, 2017. "Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(4), pages 785-815, November.
    2. John Rigby, 2009. "Comparing the scientific quality achieved by funding instruments for single grant holders and for collaborative networks within a research system: Some observations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(1), pages 145-164, January.
    3. Nicola Francesco Dotti & André Spithoven, 2017. "Spatial perspectives on knowledge brokers: Evidence from Brussels," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(10), pages 2203-2222, October.
    4. Liviu Neamtu & Adina Claudia Neamtu, 2015. "Academic Mission - From Autocracy To Bureaucracy," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 113-120, December.
    5. Dimitrios Konstadakopulos, 2009. "Cooling the earth? The changing priorities of EU–Asia technology cooperation," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 345-366, June.
    6. Iris Wanzenböck & Koen Frenken, 2018. "The subsidiarity principle: Turning challenge-oriented innovation policy on its head," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1806, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2018.
    7. Nedeva, Maria, 2013. "Between the global and the national: Organising European science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 220-230.
    8. Frank, Joshua, 2005. "Technological lock-in, positive institutional feedback, and research on laboratory animals," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 557-575, December.
    9. Werner Hölzl, 2006. "Cohesion and Excellence. Two ways to a better Europe?," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 28810.
    10. Nina Mcguinness & Conor O'Carroll, 2010. "Benchmarking Europe's Lab Benches: How Successful has the OMC been in Research Policy?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 293-318, March.
    11. Benedetto Lepori & Valerio Veglio & Barbara Heller-Schuh & Thomas Scherngell & Michael Barber, 2015. "Participations to European Framework Programs of higher education institutions and their association with organizational characteristics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2149-2178, December.
    12. Kaiser, Robert & Prange, Heiko, 2002. "A new concept of deepening European integration? The European Research Area and the emerging role of policy coordination in a multi-level governance system," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 6, October.
    13. Rüffin, Nicolas, 2020. "EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    14. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Ron Boschma & Koen Frenken, 2015. "Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 907-920, June.
    15. Claude Robert & Concepción S. Wilson & Stéphane Donnadieu & Jean-François Gaudy & Charles-Daniel Arreto, 2009. "Analysis of the medical and biological pain research literature in the European Union: A 2006 snapshot," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(3), pages 693-716, September.
    16. Laura Cruz-Castro & Koen Jonkers & Luis Sanz-Menéndez, 2015. "The internationalisation of research institutes," Working Papers 1513, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    17. Hoekman, Jarno & Frenken, Koen & Tijssen, Robert J.W., 2010. "Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 662-673, June.
    18. Rüffin, Nicolas, 2020. "EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 1-1.
    19. Daniela Cagno & Andrea Fabrizi & Valentina Meliciani, 2014. "The impact of participation in European joint research projects on knowledge creation and economic growth," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 836-858, December.
    20. Zhelyu Vladimirov, 2018. "Discussing Innovation Policy Biases in the New EU Member States," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 3-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2015:v:6special:p:388-393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.