IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2013v1p82-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Model For Return On Capital Employed

Author

Listed:
  • BURJA CAMELIA

    (1 DECEMBRIE 1918 UNIVERSITY OF ALBA IULIA)

Abstract

At the microeconomic level, the appreciation of the capitals’ profitability is a very complex action which is of interest for stakeholders. This study has as main purpose to extend the traditional analysis model for the capitals’ profitability, based on the ratio “Return on capital employed”. In line with it the objectives of this work aim the identification of factors that exert an influence on the capital’s profitability utilized by a company and the measurement of their contribution in the manifestation of the phenomenon. The proposed analysis model is validated on the use case of a representative company from the agricultural sector. The results obtained reveal that in a company there are some factors which can act positively on the capitals’ profitability: capital turnover, sales efficiency, increase the share of sales in the total revenues, improvement of the expenses’ efficiency. The findings are useful both for the decisionmaking factors in substantiating the economic strategies and for the capital owners who are interested in efficiency of their investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Burja Camelia, 2013. "Analysis Model For Return On Capital Employed," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 82-87, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2013:v:1:p:82-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2013-01/10_Burja%20Camelia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ph D Professor Aslau Titus & Ph D Lecturer Cuc Lavinia Denisia, 2010. "Assigning Strategic Objectives and Managing Profitability Ratios," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 1422-1425, May.
    2. S C Bardia, 2008. "Evaluation of Financial Performance: A Dialectics," The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, IUP Publications, vol. 0(1), pages 36-49, January.
    3. Imran Omer Chhapra & Nousheen Abbas Naqvi, 2010. "Relationship between Efficiency Level of Working Capital Management and Profitability of Firms in the Textile Sector of Pakistan," Indus Journal of Management & Social Science (IJMSS), Department of Business Administration, vol. 4(1), pages 30-42, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siti Zaleha Abdul Rasid & Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman & Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail, 2011. "Management accounting and risk management in Malaysian financial institutions: An exploratory study," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(7), pages 566-585, July.
    2. Mohammad Tahir & Melati Anuar, 2016. "The determinants of working capital management and firms performance of textile sector in pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 605-618, March.
    3. Ijaz Hussain, 2012. "The Consequences of Easy Credit Policy, High Gearing, and Firms’ Profitability in Pakistan’s Textile Sector: A Panel Data Analysis," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 17(1), pages 33-44, Jan-June.
    4. Mohammad Tahir & Melati Binti Ahmad Anuar, 2016. "The determinants of working capital management and firms performance of textile sector in pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 605-618, March.
    5. Minhas Akbar & Ahsan Akbar & Muhammad Umar Draz, 2021. "Global Financial Crisis, Working Capital Management, and Firm Performance: Evidence From an Islamic Market Index," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2013:v:1:p:82-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.