IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbk/journl/v13y2024i2p229-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Responsibility of the Financial Sector in the Information and Network Economy: The Example of Systemically Important Banks in Ukraine and Comparison With Banks in Other Countries of the World

Author

Listed:
  • Oksana V. Portna

    (V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Department of Management and Administration, Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Natalia Yu. Iershova

    (National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute», Department of Accounting and Finance, Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Andrii A. Grytsenko

    (Institute for Economics and Forecasting, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The article examines the problem of increasing social responsibility of the financial sector on the example of systemically important banks that operate in the modern information and network economy under conditions of uncertainty. A comparative analysis of dimensions of social responsibility of banks in different countries of the world was carried out. Based on the obtained results, the importance of social responsibility of banking structures for a wide range of stakeholders and thus for stable and successful operation of banks in the economics of information and uncertainty was confirmed. The general purpose of the study is to develop, test and suggest a comprehensive methodology for monitoring and assessing the level of social responsibility of the financial sector on the example of Ukrainian banks in conditions of uncertainty and recognizing gaps between the actual level and the desired, maximally high state of social responsibility. In our research, we considered social responsibility as a key direction towards achieving and harmonizing the strategic goals of financial institutions. The article focuses on the development of practical measures to monitor public opinions and assess the level of social responsibility of financial institutions. The research offers the following directions: 1) A comparative analysis of data for systemically important banks in Ukraine and other world countries regarding social responsibility; 2) determination of factors that influence the activity of the banking sector; 3) determination of question-indicators applied to the level of social responsibility of banks; 4) analysis of public opinion on the level of social responsibility of banks; 5) analysis of gaps in assessments of the level of social responsibility on the example of systemically important banks of Ukraine. The study involved the methods of statistical research and expert evaluations that made it possible to suggest a methodology for determining the level of social responsibility of financial institutions on the example of systemically important banks. Higher expectations from social responsibility of banks on the part of society were also revealed. The suggested methodology involves analyzing gaps between assessments by stakeholders and the desired level of social responsibility of banks in evaluating the level of compliance with social responsibility. A comparison of the average score of the public assessment with the highest level of social responsibility of banks is visualized. The directions for improving the social responsibility policy are outlined on the example of systemically important banks in Ukraine on the basis of a comparative analysis and taking into account various experiences around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksana V. Portna & Natalia Yu. Iershova & Andrii A. Grytsenko, 2024. "Social Responsibility of the Financial Sector in the Information and Network Economy: The Example of Systemically Important Banks in Ukraine and Comparison With Banks in Other Countries of the World," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 13(2), pages 229-258.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbk:journl:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:229-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cbcg.me/repec/cbk/journl/vol13no2-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social responsibility; financial sector; banks; information and network economy; changes; public opinion; stakeholders; gap analysis.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbk:journl:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:229-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbmgvme.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.