IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/rferfe/rfe_162_0093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunités et limites de la Méthode d’évaluation contingente en régime de gouvernance multi-niveaux

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Bance
  • Angélique Chassy

Abstract

Public governing bodies (at local, regional, national or supranational levels) try to measure the efficiency of their spending. In a context of multilevel governance and shared decision-making by these diverse levels of government, can the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) be a useful tool for public authorities ? This method may allow them to decide together between varied programs by basing choices on the preferences of public users. This article analyzes the operational scope of the method as a tool of dialogue and communication as well as the limits of its implementation as part of the decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Bance & Angélique Chassy, 2016. "Opportunités et limites de la Méthode d’évaluation contingente en régime de gouvernance multi-niveaux," Revue française d'économie, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(2), pages 93-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:rferfe:rfe_162_0093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RFE_162_0093
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-economie-2016-2-page-93.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philippe Bance & Angélique Chassy, 2019. "Citizen Advisory Committees: A Tool to Remedy the Shortcomings of the Contingent Valuation Method Within the System of Multi-Level Governance," Post-Print hal-02910727, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rferfe:rfe_162_0093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-economie.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.