IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/repdal/redp_231_0127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Méthodes d'équivalence et compensation du dommage environnemental

Author

Listed:
  • Adeline Bas
  • Pascal Gastineau
  • Julien Hay
  • Harold Levrel

Abstract

This article deals with environmental damage valuation in France. In coming years, current practices should be influenced by the Environmental Liability Directive which sets out requirements that member states must enact to prevent and remedy environmental damage, specifically damage to habitats and species. Directive 2004/35/CE reinforces the ?polluter pays? principle and introduces new useful methodologies to assess and compensate environmental damage : the equivalency methods. These methods, developed by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), are used to scale remediation needed to compensate for past, current and future damages related to an incident. Two approaches to resource compensation can be distinguished : the service-service approach (or resource-resource approach) and the valuation scaling approaches (value-to-value and value-to-cost approaches). After introducing both of them, we identify some theoretical and practical pitfalls related to their use.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeline Bas & Pascal Gastineau & Julien Hay & Harold Levrel, 2013. "Méthodes d'équivalence et compensation du dommage environnemental," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 123(1), pages 127-157.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_231_0127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=REDP_231_0127
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique-2013-1-page-127.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hrabanski, Marie, 2015. "The biodiversity offsets as market-based instruments in global governance: Origins, success and controversies," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 143-151.
    2. Froger, Géraldine & Ménard, Sophie & Méral, Philippe, 2015. "Towards a comparative and critical analysis of biodiversity banks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 152-161.
    3. Nathalie Dumax & Anne Rozan & Bénédicte Rulleau, 2020. "“Adapted” Habitat Evaluation Procedure and Choice Experiment: Substitutes or Complements?," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(02), pages 1-30, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_231_0127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.