IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/reidbu/rei_125_0105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Théorie de l'agence et concessions de chemins de fer français au 19ème siècle

Author

Listed:
  • Guy Numa

Abstract

This article examines the railway concessions in France in the 19th century as examples of a principal-agent relationship between the State and a contractor. I show that one of the main assumptions of the agency theory, the asymmetric information at the benefit of the agent, is not verified. I also present a new approach by defining the interest guarantee as a specific sort of risk sharing that diminishes the effort incentive. While the principal-agent model predicts increased effort on the part of the agent under conditions of risk sharing, I demonstrate that railway companies made less effort to efficiently manage their operations. Therefore, I suggest that agency theory does not account for the efficiency and the function of 19th century railway concessions in France. After briefly retracing the history of these concessions, I introduce the theoretical framework of the principal-agent model then I apply it to the particular case of the French railway concessions.

Suggested Citation

  • Guy Numa, 2009. "Théorie de l'agence et concessions de chemins de fer français au 19ème siècle," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 105-128.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:reidbu:rei_125_0105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=REI_125_0105
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-industrielle-2009-1-page-105.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuela Mosca, 2015. "A Review of "Réglementations et concurrence dans le chemins de fer français, 1823-1914", by Guy Numa," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 140-144, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:reidbu:rei_125_0105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-industrielle.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.