IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/recosp/reco_634_0795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dilemme en action motrice et robustesse de la stratégie évolutionnairement stable

Author

Listed:
  • Luc Collard
  • Alexandre Obœuf
  • Marc Legrand

Abstract

In a game of evolution solved by the motor action, the Evolutionarily Stable Strategy (ess) is robust? Fifty-six student athletes participate in the game Hawks versus Doves. The each play five times. Two players are at the same distance from a balloon. They secretly choose a jersey, different color for dove and hawk. At the signal, everyone tries to bring the ball into this camp. Players use the techniques of rugby for hawk and the techniques of basketball for dove. The ess invites theoretically choose hawk 7 out of 12. Of the 140 tournaments, the players (25) who have played the Nash equilibrium have not maximized their gains. This is due to the motor relevance of the game. Players away from the ess show a different logic based on their dynamic possibilities of intervention in conjunction with the characteristics of the other players. Classification JEL : C72, C88, C93

Suggested Citation

  • Luc Collard & Alexandre Obœuf & Marc Legrand, 2012. "Dilemme en action motrice et robustesse de la stratégie évolutionnairement stable," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 63(4), pages 795-808.
    • Handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_634_0795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RECO_634_0795
    Download Restriction: free
    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-economique-2012-4-page-795.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C88 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Other Computer Software
    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_634_0795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-economique.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.