IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/edddbu/edd_202_0131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Au-delà de la controverse prêts ou dons : comment utiliser la dette pour le développement ?. Beyond “Grants versus Loans”: How to Use Debt for Development?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Cohen
  • Pierre Jacquet
  • Helmut Reisen

Abstract

This paper looks at the ?grants versus loans? controversy. It questions the claim sometimes made that development institutions should refrain from making loans and should instead distribute ODA as outright grants only. It discusses various reasons why developing countries do not have full access to international capital markets beyond the traditionally invoked problem of weak governance and institutions and beyond factors within their own responsibility. There are market failures that justify ODA, and there is a priori no overall superiority of grants as compared to loans. To the contrary, we believe that loans may provide a superior solution, provided that they focus on the key issue of maintaining debt sustainability. Finally, and beyond the loans-versus-grants controversy, the paper also proposes to revisit the traditional paradigm of ODA.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Cohen & Pierre Jacquet & Helmut Reisen, 2006. "Au-delà de la controverse prêts ou dons : comment utiliser la dette pour le développement ?. Beyond “Grants versus Loans”: How to Use Debt for Development?," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 14(2), pages 131-158.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:edddbu:edd_202_0131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=EDD_202_0131
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-du-developpement-2006-2-page-131.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:edddbu:edd_202_0131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceauvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.