IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/accafc/cca_232_0111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gestion processuelle des résultats : une étude des dépenses de R&D des entreprises françaises cotées

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Dumas

Abstract

Two earnings management techniques are based on R&D expenditures: (i) reducing R&D spending and (ii) capitalization of R&D spending. In this paper, we examine whether both techniques are used by French firms to meet earnings thresholds (zero earnings and prior year earnings). Firstly, we study each technique separately. Our results show that R&D spending is capitalized in order to meet these thresholds, and managers reduce R&D in order to meet them. We then investigate whether managers use the two earnings management techniques in a coordinated way, and show that they are used in combination. More precisely, these earnings management techniques are substitutes for each other: low use of one is balanced by greater use of the other. We contribute to the literature by showing an earnings management process in which managers combine more than one earnings management technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Dumas, 2017. "Gestion processuelle des résultats : une étude des dépenses de R&D des entreprises françaises cotées," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 23(2), pages 111-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:cai:accafc:cca_232_0111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=CCA_232_0111
    Download Restriction: free
    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-comptabilite-controle-audit-2017-2-page-111.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillaume Dumas & Alexandre Di Giacomo & Quentin Arnaud, 2021. "Stock-options: an efficient tool to fight R&D managerial short-termism ? [L’attribution de stock-options : un outil efficace de lutte contre le court-termisme managérial en matière de R&D ?]," Post-Print hal-03948379, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:accafc:cca_232_0111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-accra.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.