Author
Listed:
- RC Costa
(Department of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Surgery, State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"/UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil)
- GG Moraes
(Department of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Surgery, State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"/UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil)
- RG Ferreira
(Department of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Surgery, State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"/UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil)
- RB Neto
(Department of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Surgery, State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"/UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil)
- M Nobile
(Department of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Surgery, State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"/UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil)
- TASS Rocha
(Federal University of Jataí, UFJ, Jataí, GO, Brazil)
- LP Barros
(Department of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Surgery, State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"/UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil)
- BW Minto
(Department of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Surgery, State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"/UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil)
- LGGG Dias
(Department of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Surgery, State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"/UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil)
Abstract
Ten sets of vertebral biomodels and the corresponding drilling guides were created to evaluate the implantation accuracy in the cervical (C5-C6) and lumbar (L4-L5) vertebrae of cats. Smooth pins were implanted using the guides on the right side of five randomly assigned biomodel sets and on the left side of the remaining sets, with the contralateral side undergoing freehand implantation. Subsequently, a new tomographic study was conducted to measure the implantation angles. The pre-implantation angles were compared with the post-implantation angles between the techniques and among the sets. The guide-assisted implantation exhibited a lower dispersion compared to the freehand technique, with coefficients of variation of -1.95 and 48.9 in the cervical vertebrae and 1.98 and 9.39 in the lumbar vertebrae, respectively. However, no statistical difference was observed between the pre- and post-implantation angles, nor when comparing the vertebral segments (P > 0.05). Under the study conditions, the use of the guide failed to result in more accurate implantations in the C5-C6 and L4-L5 vertebral biomodels of cats.
Suggested Citation
RC Costa & GG Moraes & RG Ferreira & RB Neto & M Nobile & TASS Rocha & LP Barros & BW Minto & LGGG Dias, 2025.
"Assessment of the accuracy of patient-specific drilling guides for cervical (C5-C6) and lumbar (L4-L5) vertebrae in cats,"
Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(1), pages 11-19.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:70:y:2025:i:1:id:73-2024-vetmed
DOI: 10.17221/73/2024-VETMED
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:70:y:2025:i:1:id:73-2024-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.