IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v67y2022i6id43-2021-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treatments and therapeutic protocols for the recovery of an asphyxiated new-born: A review of pre-clinical and clinical studies in human neonates and in different animal models

Author

Listed:
  • P Islas-Fabila

    (Doctoral Program in Biological Sciences and Health, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México City, México)

  • H Orozco-Gregorio

    (Private Professional Practice, México City, México)

  • P Roldan-Santiago

    (Reproduction Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México)

  • M Waytula

    (School of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Universidad del Valle de México, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México)

  • M Gonzalez-Hernandez

    (Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, México)

  • X Vega- Manriquez

    (Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, México)

  • CA Jimenez-Collado

    (General Director of Laboratorios Manuell S.A., Morelos, México City, México)

  • H Bonilla-Jaime

    (Department of Reproductive Biology, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México City, México)

Abstract

The objective of this review is to ascertain the advantages and disadvantages of several treatments and therapeutic protocols that have been used for the prevention and treatment of perinatal asphyxia in human neonates and in different animal models. Perinatal asphyxia is one of the main causes of mortality worldwide and is an important factor in triggering physio-metabolic disorders that result in serious neurological consequences and learning disorders not only in human foetuses and neonates, but also in animals. In recent years, the search for new pharmacological protocols to prevent and reverse physio-metabolic disorders and brain damage derived from perinatal asphyxia has been and continues to be the subject of intense research. Currently, within these pharmacological protocols, therapeutic strategies have been evaluated that use respiratory and hormonal stimulants, as well as hypothermic therapies in combination with other putative neuroprotective agents. Similarly, energy supplements have been evaluated with the objective of preventing perinatal asphyxia and treating new-borns with this condition, and to decrease the incidence of neonatal and foetal deaths associated with it. However, despite these promising advances, this pathology has persisted, since the administration of these therapies in low doses may not exert a neuroprotective effect or, in high doses, can trigger adverse effects (such as reduced cardiac contractility, reduced cerebral blood flow, poor perfusion, sympathetic and neuroendocrine stimulation, and increased blood viscosity) in human foetuses and neonates as well as in different animal models (rats, piglets, sheep and rabbits). Therefore, it is important to determine the minimum effective dose with which these therapies exert a neuroprotective effect, as well as the mode of administration, the duration of therapy, etc. Therefore, until a powerful strategy is found to improve the consequences of suffocation, this topic will continue to be the subject of intensive research in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • P Islas-Fabila & H Orozco-Gregorio & P Roldan-Santiago & M Waytula & M Gonzalez-Hernandez & X Vega- Manriquez & CA Jimenez-Collado & H Bonilla-Jaime, 2022. "Treatments and therapeutic protocols for the recovery of an asphyxiated new-born: A review of pre-clinical and clinical studies in human neonates and in different animal models," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 271-297.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:67:y:2022:i:6:id:43-2021-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/43/2021-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/43/2021-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/43/2021-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/43/2021-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:67:y:2022:i:6:id:43-2021-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.