IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v67y2022i4id138-2020-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of dexmedetomidine or tramadol continuous rate infusions on the propofol requirements and cardiorespiratory variables in propofol-ketamine-midazolam anaesthetised cats

Author

Listed:
  • T Souza

    (Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil)

  • N Anjos

    (Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil)

  • I Kersul

    (Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil)

  • E Martins Filho

    (Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil)

  • T Nunes

    (Department of Anatomy, Pathology and Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil †In memoriam)

  • V Barbosa

    (Department of Anatomy, Pathology and Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil †In memoriam)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of midazolam-ketamine alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine or tramadol in a constant rate infusion (CRI) on the minimum infusion rate (MIR) of propofol and the cardiorespiratory function in cats undergoing an ovariohysterectomy (OH). This was a prospective, randomised, blinded clinical study. Twenty-four healthy female mixed-breed cats were premedicated with ketamine and midazolam. Propofol was used for the induction and maintenance of the anaesthesia (starting at 18 mg/kg/h). Cats were assigned to groups (n = 8) to receive one of the following intravenous treatments: midazolam-ketamine group (MKG; ketamine 0.6 mg/kg/h); midazolam-ketamine-dexmedetomidine group [MKDG; ketamine 0.6 mg/kg/h and dexmedetomidine loading dose (LD) 1 mg/kg, CRI 1 mg/kg/h)] or midazolam-ketamine-tramadol group [MKTG; ketamine 0.6 mg/kg/h and tramadol (LD 2 mg/kg, CRI 1 mg/kg/h)]. During the OH, the propofol infusion was adjusted based on the clinical signs to maintain adequate anaesthetic depth. Selected variables were measured before (T0) and after (T1) the anaesthesia induction and during six surgical time points (T2-T7). The mean arterial pressure was higher and the heart rate was lower in MKDG at T1 (than in MKG and MKTG). The mean ± SD MIR of propofol were 17.4 ± 3.2, 15.0 ± 2.8 and 12.6 ± 3.5 mg/kg/h for MKG, MKTG, and MKDG, respectively. We conclude that, compared to midazolam-ketamine alone, midazolam-ketamine-tramadol and midazolam-ketamine-dexmedetomidine reduced the MRI of propofol by 13.8% and 27.5%, respectively, without significant changes in the selected indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • T Souza & N Anjos & I Kersul & E Martins Filho & T Nunes & V Barbosa, 2022. "Effects of dexmedetomidine or tramadol continuous rate infusions on the propofol requirements and cardiorespiratory variables in propofol-ketamine-midazolam anaesthetised cats," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(4), pages 199-205.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:67:y:2022:i:4:id:138-2020-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/138/2020-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/138/2020-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/138/2020-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/138/2020-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:67:y:2022:i:4:id:138-2020-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.