IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v64y2019i8id6-2019-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of propofol and alfaxalone in a continuous rate infusion in dogs with mitral valve insufficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Capik

    (University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, Small Animals Clinic, Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Isabela Polkovska

    (University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Department and Clinic of Animal Surgery, Lublin, Poland)

  • Branislav Lukac

    (University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, Small Animals Clinic, Kosice, Slovakia)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare alfaxalone and propofol in balanced anaesthesia using midazolam 0.5 mg/kg, xylazine 0.125 mg/kg, butorphanol 0.2 mg/kg intravenously as premedication and the ultrashort acting anaesthetics alfaxalone or propofol for inducing and maintaining in dogs with medically stabilised mitral valve regurgitation. Seven client-owned dogs with a second stage cardiac insufficiency were used in this study. All the dogs suffered from class II cardiac insufficiency according to the classification by the International Small Animal Cardiac Health Council (ISACH). All the dogs were treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (enalapril) and diuretics (furosemide), which eliminated the clinical signs of mitral valve regurgitation in all the dogs included in the study. This was a prospective controlled clinical study, 12 months in duration, when the dogs included in the study underwent regular dental prophylaxis. The dogs were monitored electrocardiographically throughout the anaesthesia for the presence of arrhythmias, % oxygen saturation of haemoglobin (%SpO2) measured by pulse oximetry, heart rate, respiratory rate and body temperature. The dogs underwent two anaesthesia procedures with an interval of one year due to the prophylaxis of periodontitis, with the first anaesthesia maintained by propofol and second one by alfaxalone. The respiratory rate was mostly significantly higher in the individuals undergoing alfaxalone anaesthesia (P < 0.05), but neither the slower respiratory frequency in the propofol anaesthesia had any negative impact on the % oxygen saturation of the haemoglobin (%SpO2). The heart frequency was significantly higher in the alfaxalone group (P < 0.005). The arterial blood pressures were comparable, but, on the contrary, the two dogs from propofol group had significantly higher blood pressure. The cardiovascular values in both types of anaesthesia had a tendency to progressively decrease within the physiological range. The level of the analgesia was significantly higher in the case of the propofol anaesthesia (P < 0.01) and the recovery period was also significantly shorter (P < 0.005). It can be concluded that the investigated ultra short acting anaesthetics used in balanced anaesthesia containing subanaesthetic doses of xylazine can be used over one hour of surgical procedures in dogs stabilised for mitral valve regurgitation without a significantly increased risk from the anaesthesia.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Capik & Isabela Polkovska & Branislav Lukac, 2019. "A comparison of propofol and alfaxalone in a continuous rate infusion in dogs with mitral valve insufficiency," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(8), pages 335-341.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:64:y:2019:i:8:id:6-2019-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/6/2019-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/6/2019-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/6/2019-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/6/2019-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:64:y:2019:i:8:id:6-2019-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.