Author
Listed:
- Blazej Nowak
- Edward Pawlina
(Department of Genetics, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland)
- Katarzyna Ilska
(Department of Genetics, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland)
- Anna Mucha
(Department of Genetics, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland)
- Wojciech Kruszynski
(Department of Genetics, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland)
Abstract
The objective of this work was to study the reasons for culling one-day old broiler chicks and to examine the relationship between the age and line of the hens and the culled chick's body mass. Hatching eggs and day-old chicks were collected from a commercial flock of the Cobb 500 and Ross 308 broiler lines. The eggs were collected when the hens were 32, 42 and 52 weeks old. The reasons for culling the chicks were assessed immediately after the chicks had been removed from the hatcheries. The four main groups of defects were distinguished, depending on the part of the chick's body. A fifth group covered general developmental defects. Within each group, the structural defects were identified in detail. The statistical analysis was performed in the R project. Amongst 57 600 chicks evaluated, 1042 malformations disqualifying them from further rearing were found in 666. The most frequent developmental defects were associated with the structure of the abdominal wall and umbilical cord: these were found in 155 chicks from the Ross 308 line and in 107 from the Cobb 500 line. In turn, umbilical defects occurred in 95 and 104 chicks from the Ross 308 and Cobb 500 lines, respectively. Abdominal defects were the most common in 107 chicks from the 42-week-old layers and in 89 chicks from the 52-week-old layers. There were also correlations between the age of the parent flock and the following defects: glued down, lack of down on the wings, contorted hips, wry neck and spine, and lack of a wake-up reflex. The average body weights of the Ross 308 and Cobb 500 chicks were 44.00 g and 43.13 g, respectively, but these differences were not statistically significant. However, the age of the broiler breeders (42 or 52 weeks) did affect the chick's body weight (P ≤ 0.05). The lightest chicks (40.75 g) came from the Ross 308 line (age 42 weeks) and were nearly 4 g lighter than all the other groups. Most relationships between the lines of the layer hens at a particular age and the occurrence of malformations in the chicks were found in the hens aged 32 weeks, which may indicate the need for changes in the management of the eggs from the youngest layers belonging to the different lines.
Suggested Citation
Blazej Nowak & Edward Pawlina & Katarzyna Ilska & Anna Mucha & Wojciech Kruszynski, 2019.
"Breeder line and age affects the occurrence of developmental defects, the number of culled one-day old broiler chicks and their body mass,"
Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(7), pages 323-333.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:64:y:2019:i:7:id:137-2018-vetmed
DOI: 10.17221/137/2018-VETMED
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:64:y:2019:i:7:id:137-2018-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.