Author
Listed:
- I De Amicis
(Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Piano D'Accio, Teramo, Italy)
- L Stehlik
(Small Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)
- F Del Signore
(Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Piano D'Accio, Teramo, Italy)
- S Parrillo
(Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Piano D'Accio, Teramo, Italy)
- D Robbe
(Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Piano D'Accio, Teramo, Italy)
- R Tamburro
(Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Piano D'Accio, Teramo, Italy)
- M Vignoli
(Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Piano D'Accio, Teramo, Italy)
Abstract
Radiography is routinely used for pelvimetry, but it is not easily accessible for farm animals, while ultrasonographic pelvimetry could be used due to the better accessibility and lack of radiation hazard. Radiographic and ultrasonographic pelvimetry in goats were compared, and three diameters of the pelvis were measured; the narrowest transverse pelvic diameter at the level of the acetabula, from the pecten pubis to the sacral promontorium and from the dorsal edge of the pubis to the coccygeal vertebra. The measurement was performed three times by one observer on both modalities. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were performed. The intraobserver agreement was excellent for all the measurements and modalities in the study. Excellent agreement (ICC 0.96) was achieved for the transverse pelvic diameter. The agreement for the other two diameters was poor. We can conclude that the ultrasonographic pelvimetry of a goat is reliable only in the transverse pelvic diameter just cranial to the pecten pubis.
Suggested Citation
I De Amicis & L Stehlik & F Del Signore & S Parrillo & D Robbe & R Tamburro & M Vignoli, 2019.
"Pelvimetry in the Teramana goat breed: a comparison between radiography and ultrasound,"
Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(11), pages 476-481.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:64:y:2019:i:11:id:96-2019-vetmed
DOI: 10.17221/96/2019-VETMED
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:64:y:2019:i:11:id:96-2019-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.