IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v59y2014i8id7657-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limitations in using rabbit bladders in electrophysiological and urodynamic experiments

Author

Listed:
  • P. Zerhau

    (Clinic of Paediatric Surgery, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital and Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Z. Mackerle

    (Clinic of Paediatric Surgery, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital and Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic)

  • M. Husar

    (Clinic of Paediatric Surgery, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital and Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic)

  • E. Brichtova

    (Clinic of Paediatric Surgery, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital and Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic)

  • D. Sochurkova

    (Clinic of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of St. Anna and Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic)

  • E. Göpfert

    (Veterinary Research Institute Brno, Czech Republic)

  • M. Faldyna

    (Veterinary Research Institute Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the possibility of using rabbit bladder as a model for experimental detrusor electrostimulation research. In a study of urinary bladder activity induced through electrostimulation of the ventral roots, the functional and morphological parameters of the rabbit detrusor were investigated. Under general anaesthesia, open electrostimulation of ventral spinal roots leading towards the detrusor (usually S2, S3) was performed in 20 rabbits. Detrusor response was recorded by repeated electromyography and cystometry in two groups: animals with naturally concentrated urine content (Group A, eight rabbits) and animals after flushing and filling the bladder with saline (Group B, 12 rabbits). Histological examination of bladder wall was performed in both groups. The measured values were compared to one another as well as with data from the veterinary and human literature. The histological specimens were compared with histological specimens of human bladder. The reaction of detrusor fibres was detectable by electromyography in all cases. Elevation of intravesical pressure as a consequence of detrusor contraction was more difficult to detect, as this depends more on the density of the intravesical content. The pressure rise in Group B had a higher amplitude - up to 15 cm H2O versus 5 cm H2O in the first group (P = 0.00046). Histological examination of bladder wall from the two groups of rabbits showed no differences. In comparison with the bladder wall in humans, the only differences found were significantly thinner detrusor layers relative to the overall thickness of bladder wall. It is possible to use rabbit bladder for research into experimentally electrostimulation-induced activity of the detrusor or for experimental detrusor reinnervation research. It is necessary, however, to take into account certain limits - the lower contractility of the bladder wall and the need for qualitative control of bladder content. The present results also suggest that the physiological micturition of rabbits is probably more dependent on abdominal pressure than in humans.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Zerhau & Z. Mackerle & M. Husar & E. Brichtova & D. Sochurkova & E. Göpfert & M. Faldyna, 2014. "Limitations in using rabbit bladders in electrophysiological and urodynamic experiments," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(8), pages 376-381.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:59:y:2014:i:8:id:7657-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/7657-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/7657-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/7657-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/7657-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:59:y:2014:i:8:id:7657-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.