IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v57y2012i11id6464-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Susceptibility of Mycoplasma bovis field isolates to antimicrobial agents

Author

Listed:
  • J. Siugzdaite

    (Lithuanian University of Health Science, Veterinary Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • A. Gabinaitiene

    (Lithuanian University of Health Science, Veterinary Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • S. Kerziene

    (Lithuanian University of Health Science, Veterinary Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the antibacterial susceptibility of field isolates of Mycoplasma bovis originating from the upper respiratory tract of cattle of different ages. Bacteriological examination of 90 nasal swabs collected from calves at three months of age identified M. bovis in 31 (34.44%) samples. Seventeen (18.88%) of these animals still housed M. bovis in their nasal cavity at nine months and five animals (5.55%) still at seventeen months of age. M. bovis were confirmed by biochemical and antigenic methods. To confirm that these belonged to the M. bovis species isolated mycoplasmas were tested using the PCR method. Fifteen field strains of M. bovis isolated from the same cattle at three, nine and seventeen months (five strains from each age group) were selected for antibacterial susceptibility testing against six groups of antimicrobial agents using an agar dilution method. The MIC90 ranges established for tylosin, tulathromycin, enrofloxacin, florfenicol and lincomycin were 0.39-0.78 µg/ml, 0.50-1.00 µg/ml, 0.78-1.56 µg/ml, 3.12 µg/ml and 0.39-0.78 µg/ml, respectively. The range of MIC90 for oxytetracycline was from 50 to 100 µg/ml. Preliminary examination of the antimicrobial susceptibility of field strains of M. bovis did not reveal significant differences between different age groups of cattle. After evaluation of the MIC90 data with the SPSS 13.0 statistical package it was found that M. bovis isolates from animals at three, nine and seventeen months were similarly susceptible to tylosin and tulathromycin. Statistically significant differences in susceptibility of M. bovis isolated from cattle of different ages were found to florfenicol compared with tulathromycin (P < 0.01), lincomycin (P < 0.01) and enrofloxacin (P < 0.05). The susceptibility of all M. bovis isolates to oxytetracycline and penicillin G significantly differed from the sensitivity to all other antimicrobial agents used in the present study (P < 0.05). The in vitro susceptibility test showed that field isolates of M. bovis isolated from cattle of different ages were similarly sensitive to tylosin, tulathromycin, lincomycin and enrofloxacin. It was also determined that the field strains are resistant to oxytetracycline.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Siugzdaite & A. Gabinaitiene & S. Kerziene, 2012. "Susceptibility of Mycoplasma bovis field isolates to antimicrobial agents," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(11), pages 575-582.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:57:y:2012:i:11:id:6464-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/6464-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/6464-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/6464-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/6464-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:57:y:2012:i:11:id:6464-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.