IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v54y2009i12id44-2009-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Susceptibility of bacteria of the Enterococcus genus isolated on Lithuanian poultry farms

Author

Listed:
  • M. Ruzauskas

    (Lithuanian Veterinary Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • R. Siugzdiniene

    (Lithuanian Veterinary Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • V. Spakauskas

    (Lithuanian Veterinary Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • J. Povilonis

    (Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • V. Seputiene

    (Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • E. Suziedeliene

    (Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • R. Daugelavicius

    (Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • A. Pavilonis

    (Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test and analyse the antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus isolates from Lithuanian poultry farms. Investigations were carried out during the years 2008-2009. The sampling sites, located all over the country, included eight poultry farms of large capacity. All samples were collected from broilers. Enterococcus spp. were isolated from intestines immediately after slaughtering. A total of 160 samples were collected, 20 samples from each farm. The MICs (Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations) of eleven antimicrobial agents were determined for each of the isolates using the broth microdilution method with specific microtitre plate panels (Trek Diagnostic Systems, Inc.). Susceptibility according to clinical breakpoints of chloramphenicol, linezolid, erythromycin, penicillin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, tetracycline, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin and nitrofurantoin was evaluated. One hundred and forty seven samples (92%) from a total of 160 tested samples were positive for Enterococcus spp., however, only 74 strains were selected as non-duplicate isolates. The most predominant species were identified as E. faecium (38%), E. faecalis (17.5%), E. gallinarum (12%) and E. casseliflavus (12%). The most frequent resistance properties were resistances to tetracycline (75.6%), erythromycin (56.8%) and ciprofloxacin (41.9%). No strains resistant to vancomycin and linezolid were found. High percentages of susceptibility to chloramphenicol (82.4%) and penicillin (71.6%) were also observed. A high MIC of tigecycline (≥ 1 mg/l) to 12.2% of enterococci was determined during this study. 44.6% of tested strains had a high MIC (≥ 64 mg/l) to tylosin. There was no significant correlation found between resistances of different species to different antimicrobial agents in vitro.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Ruzauskas & R. Siugzdiniene & V. Spakauskas & J. Povilonis & V. Seputiene & E. Suziedeliene & R. Daugelavicius & A. Pavilonis, 2009. "Susceptibility of bacteria of the Enterococcus genus isolated on Lithuanian poultry farms," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(12), pages 583-588.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:54:y:2009:i:12:id:44-2009-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/44/2009-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/44/2009-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/44/2009-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/44/2009-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:54:y:2009:i:12:id:44-2009-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.