Author
Listed:
- J.E. Shitaye
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Czech Republic)
- L. Matlova
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- A. Horvathova
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- M. Moravkova
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- L. Dvorska-Bartosova
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- I. Trcka
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- J. Lamka
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic)
- F. Treml
(University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Czech Republic)
- V. Vrbas
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- I. Pavlik
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
Abstract
Avian tuberculosis (ATBC) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in birds in zoos and breeding establishments. The primary sources of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium (MAA) of serotypes 1, 2 and 3 are infected animals (esp. birds), who shed MAA in different ways and thus contaminate the environment. The first aim of this work was to compare the efficiency of the diagnostic methods that are routinely used for the diagnosis of ATBC (skin test, serology and culture of faeces and eggs) in naturally infected hens with different levels of infection. The second aim was to determine the excretion rate of MAA in faeces and eggs. The tuberculin skin test gave a positive result in nine (42.9%) infected hens of which four (57.1%) and one (14.3%) were heavily and slightly infected hens, respectively. A positive serological response to MAA-b antigen (water bird isolate of serotype 1) was observed in five (23.8%) and to MAA-p antigen (pig isolate serotype 2) in seven (33.3%) hens. No correlation between serological and skin-test data was found. The results show that both techniques, serological and skin-test data are inadequate for the diagnosis of ATBC. In consecutively euthanized hens, with heavy infection and tuberculous lesions, serological positivity was significant (P < 0.05) in comparison with slightly infected hens lacking tuberculous lesions. Faecal culture detected MAA in 50 (29.8%) of 168 samples collected for eight days before euthanasia. MAA excretion in faeces was intermittent, but significantly (P < 0.01) higher in heavily infected hens. No mycobacteria were detected in any of the 43 examined eggs, which implies that the shedding of MAAand/or transmission of ATBC through eggs may not be frequent events.
Suggested Citation
J.E. Shitaye & L. Matlova & A. Horvathova & M. Moravkova & L. Dvorska-Bartosova & I. Trcka & J. Lamka & F. Treml & V. Vrbas & I. Pavlik, 2008.
"Diagnostic testing of different stages of avian tuberculosis in naturally infected hens (Gallus domesticus) by the tuberculin skin and rapid agglutination tests, faecal and egg examinations,"
Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 101-110.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:53:y:2008:i:2:id:1984-vetmed
DOI: 10.17221/1984-VETMED
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:53:y:2008:i:2:id:1984-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.