IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v52y2007i3id2013-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of the Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 strain on complications of the chronic experimental liver damage

Author

Listed:
  • D. Kosakova

    (Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary and Pharmaceutical University, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • P. Scheer

    (Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary and Pharmaceutical University, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • J. Lata

    (Internal Clinic of Gastroenterology, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
    Faculty Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • J. Doubek

    (Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary and Pharmaceutical University, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The aim of the study was evaluate the influence of the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 strain (Mutaflor® suspension, Ardeypharm GmbH, Herdecke, Germany) on bacterial translocation in cases of liver damage, damage to the intestinal mucosa, potential portal hypertension associated with possible development of oesophageal varices and on the bacterial population of the intestine during chronic experimental liver damage in the laboratory rat. Rats with liver damage induced by thioacetamide were divided into an experimental and control group. Experimental and control animals were applied Mutaflor and saline, respectively. Samples of blood, liver, lymph nodes and caecum for microbiological examination, of liver, duodenum and oesophagus for histological examination and of spleen for weight evaluation were collected. There were no significant differences between both groups of animals in the qualitative proportion of Staphylococcus spp., Enterococcus spp. and Proteus spp. cultured from the lymph nodes, blood and liver. The quantitative culture results on Enterococcus spp. in the caecum, liver and lymph nodes showed no significant differences between both groups. There was a significant difference between the experimental and control group in the counts of coliform bacteria. No significant differences between both groups were found in the overall damage score of the liver, duodenum and oesophagus. There were no differences in the spleen to body weight ratio of both groups. The application of Mutaflor® suspension for eight days had no recognisable effect diminishing the selected complications of chronic liver damage caused by the administration of TAA to laboratory rats.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Kosakova & P. Scheer & J. Lata & J. Doubek, 2007. "Influence of the Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 strain on complications of the chronic experimental liver damage," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(3), pages 121-129.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:52:y:2007:i:3:id:2013-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/2013-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/2013-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/2013-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/2013-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:52:y:2007:i:3:id:2013-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.