Author
Listed:
- G. Ozbey
(Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science,)
- H. Ongor
(Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science,)
- D. T Balik
(Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science,)
- V. Celik
(Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science,)
- A. Kilic
(Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science,)
- A. Muz
(Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science,)
Abstract
In the present study, lung, trachea and serum samples from broiler flocks slaughtered at an abattoir in Elazig province located in the East of Turkey were examined for the presence of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale using culture and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The identity was latter proved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), western blot analysis, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. A total of 324 serum and 250 lung and trachea samples were collected from 10 commercially reared chicken flocks showing respiratory manifestations. The samples were obtained from different flocks. The causative agent (ORT) was isolated from trachea (1.5%) of five chickens and from both lung and trachea (0.4%) of only one chicken in the bacteriological examination of tissues. The presence of antibodies against ORT was detected in 33 (10.2%) of the 324 sera by ELISA. A 784 bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using specific primers in the PCR. All ORT isolates that were positive by culture were also detected to be positive by the PCR. SDS-PAGE protein profiles of whole cell extracts showed a high similarity for all the isolates with a major band of the molecular weight of 33 kDa (kiloDalton). Results of Western blot analysis indicate four antigenic fractions predominantly with molecular weights of 33, 42, 52 and 66 kDa.
Suggested Citation
G. Ozbey & H. Ongor & D. T Balik & V. Celik & A. Kilic & A. Muz, 2004.
"Investigations on ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in broiler flocks in elazig province located in the east of turkey,"
Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(8), pages 305-311.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:49:y:2004:i:8:id:5709-vetmed
DOI: 10.17221/5709-VETMED
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:49:y:2004:i:8:id:5709-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.