Author
Listed:
- M. Machackova
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- L. Matlova
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- J. Lamka
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic)
- J. Smolik
(District Veterinary Administration, Melnik, Czech Republic)
- I. Mmelicharek
(State Veterinary Diagnostic Institute, Nitra, Slovakia)
- M. Hanzalikova
(State Veterinary Diagnostic Institute, Nitra, Slovakia)
- J. Docekal
(District Veterinary Administration, Znojmo, Czech Republic)
- Z. Cvetnik
(Croatian Veterinary Institute, Zagreb, Croatia)
- G. Nagy
(Central Veterinary Institute, Budapest, Hungary)
- M. Lipiec
(National Veterinary Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland)
- M. Ocepek
(Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)
- I. Pavlik
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
Abstract
Infected animals in the wild, which can act as a reservoir and/or vector for the origin of bovine tuberculosis, are a great problem for national programmes seeking to free herds of cattle from the infection. The circulation of Mycobacterium bovis in the wild animal population might cause a slow-down in the progress of control programmes through the reinfection of herds of livestock. The Eurasian badger (Meles meles) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) living in the wild in Great Britain and Ireland, brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), ferrets (Mustela putorius f. furo) in New Zealand and wild buffalo (Bubalus arnee) in Australia are among already known reservoirs and vectors of bovine tuberculosis. In 7 countries of Central Europe (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia) bovine tuberculosis in ca⣸84;le was controlled as part of national control programmes more than 20 years ago. In the last decade M. bovis has been diagnosed extremely sporadically in cattle and other domestic animals as well as in wild animals held in captivity or living in the wild. This favourable situation could be threatened by the mycobacteria spreading via the wild boar (Sus scrofa) which is susceptible to mycobacterial infection and very abundant in Central Europe. According to available literary data, mycobacteria were detected in 361 wild boar originating from countries other than those of Central Europe, such as Australia, Bulgaria, Germany, the Hawaiian island of Molokai, Italy and Spain. M. tuberculosis complex (33.9%) and M. bovis complex (39.8%) isolates were most frequently detected in the faeces and/or parenchymatous organs of wild boar. Of other mycobacterial species, M. intracellulare (3.8%), M. avium subsp. avium (3.8%), M. terrae (2.4%), M. fortuitum (2.2%), M. scrofulaceum (2.2%), M. gordonae (0.8%), M. simiae (0.5%), M. szulgai (0.5%), M. xenopi (0.5%), M. smegmatis (0.2%), M. vaccae (0.2%), fast-growing, further unspecified species (0.2%) and unidentified mycobacteria (8.8%) were isolated. Following the analysis of literary data and our own results, it was found that, in the area covered by the above-mentioned 7 countries of Central Europe, a total of 431 wild boar were examined for mycobacterial infections in the years 1983-2001. Tuberculous lesions in parenchymatous organs were found in 43 (10.0%) animals. M. bovis was identified in 22 (5.1%) animals, M. a. avium in 2 (0.4%), M. a. paratuberculosis in 1 (0.2%) animal and atypical mycobacteria in 27 (6.3%) animals. The wild boar may therefore represent, under certain unfavourable epizootiological conditions, a vector of some mycobacterial infections in not only animals, but also humans.
Suggested Citation
M. Machackova & L. Matlova & J. Lamka & J. Smolik & I. Mmelicharek & M. Hanzalikova & J. Docekal & Z. Cvetnik & G. Nagy & M. Lipiec & M. Ocepek & I. Pavlik, 2003.
"Wild boar (Sus scrofa) as a possible vector of mycobacterial infections: review of literature and critical analysis of data from Central Europe between 1983 to 2001,"
Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 51-65.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:48:y:2003:i:3:id:5750-vetmed
DOI: 10.17221/5750-VETMED
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:48:y:2003:i:3:id:5750-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.