IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpse/v69y2023i10id262-2023-pse.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the effect of optimised field plot size on the crop yield

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Elbl

    (Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
    Spearhead Czech, Ltd., Horní Moštěnice, Czech Republic
    Agricultural Research, Ltd., Troubsko, Czech Republic)

  • Antonín Kintl

    (Agricultural Research, Ltd., Troubsko, Czech Republic
    Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Martin Brtnický

    (Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Petr Širůček

    (Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jiří Mezera

    (Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Vladimír Smutný

    (Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Vopravil

    (Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague 5 - Zbraslav, Czech Republic)

  • Jiří Holátko

    (Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Igor Huňady

    (Agricultural Research, Ltd., Troubsko, Czech Republic)

  • Vojtěch Lukas

    (Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The presented research deals with the effect of plot size changes on the crop yield. Three plots were chosen in a company engaged in conventional agriculture, on which yields were monitored from 2019 using yield maps. In 2020, the plots (initial size > 30 ha) were divided into different parts sized < 30 ha. In 2021, these newly arisen parts of the plots were harvested. Changes in the yield of grown crops were analysed using yield maps acquired by the harvesting machines. Relative yields (%) and absolute yields (t/ha) were determined on all experimental land parts arising from the initial plots' division. The values were then compared with yields recorded before the division of individual plots using zonal statistics. Measured relative yield values clearly show (P < 0.05) that the division of plots resulted in the increased heterogeneity of crop yields. On the initial plots as well as on the newly arisen plots, the relative yield was divided into the following categories: < 70, 70-85, 85-95, 95-105, 105-115, 115-130 and > 130%, with the value of 100% representing average yield. The analysis of measured yield data showed that the division of plots into smaller parts resulted in an uneven yield distribution because if a divided plot was heterogeneous in terms of yield levels, a cumulation of "higher yield levels (> 100%)" could have occurred in one specific newly arisen plot at the expense of another one. Moreover, new marginal parts of lands came into being during the division of larger soil complexes, and hence zones with potentially reduced yields.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Elbl & Antonín Kintl & Martin Brtnický & Petr Širůček & Jiří Mezera & Vladimír Smutný & Jan Vopravil & Jiří Holátko & Igor Huňady & Vojtěch Lukas, 2023. "Assessment of the effect of optimised field plot size on the crop yield," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(10), pages 447-462.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:69:y:2023:i:10:id:262-2023-pse
    DOI: 10.17221/262/2023-PSE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/262/2023-PSE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/262/2023-PSE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/262/2023-PSE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ladislav Menšík & David Kincl & Pavel Nerušil & Jan Srbek & Lukáš Hlisnikovský & Vladimír Smutný, 2020. "Water Erosion Reduction Using Different Soil Tillage Approaches for Maize ( Zea mays L.) in the Czech Republic," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Vejchar & Jan Velebil & Karel Kubín & Jiří Bradna & Jan Malaťák, 2023. "The Effect of Reservoir Cultivation on Conventional Maize in Sandy-Loam Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Jakub Elbl & Antonín Kintl & Martin Brtnický & Petr Širůček & Jiří Mezera & Vladimír Smutný & Jan Vopravil & Jiří Holátko & Igor Huňady & Vojtěch Lukas, . "Assessment of the effect of optimised field plot size on the crop yield," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
    3. Syed Riaz Ahmed & Zeba Ali & Iram Ijaz & Zafran Khan & Nimra Gul & Soha Pervaiz & Hesham F. Alharby & Daniel K. Y. Tan & Muhammad Sayyam Tariq & Maria Ghaffar & Amir Bibi & Khalid Rehman Hakeem, 2023. "Multi-Trait Selection of Quinoa Ideotypes at Different Levels of Cutting and Spacing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Jakub Stašek & Josef Krása & Martin Mistr & Tomáš Dostál & Jan Devátý & Tomáš Středa & Jan Mikulka, 2023. "Using a Rainfall Simulator to Define the Effect of Soil Conservation Techniques on Soil Loss and Water Retention," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:69:y:2023:i:10:id:262-2023-pse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.