Author
Listed:
- Florian FABER
(Education and Research Centre for Viticulture and Pomology Klosterneuburg, Klosterneuburg, Austria)
- Elisabeth WACHTER
(Education and Research Centre for Viticulture and Pomology Klosterneuburg, Klosterneuburg, Austria)
- Johann G. ZALLER
(Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU),)
Abstract
Inter-rows in vineyards are commonly tilled in order to control weeds and/or to conserve water. While impacts of tillage on earthworms are well studied in arable systems, very little is known from vineyards. In an experimental vineyard, the impact of four reduced tillage methods on earthworms was examined: rotary hoeing, rotary harrowing, grubbing and no tillage. According to an erosion prevention programme, tillage was applied every other inter-row only while alternating rows retained vegetated. Earthworms were extracted from the treated inter-rows 10, 36, 162 and 188 days after tillage. Across dates, tillage methods had no effect on overall earthworm densities or biomass. Considering each sampling date separately, earthworm densities were affected only at day 36 after tillage leading to lower densities under rotary hoeing (150.7 ± 42.5 worms/m2) and no tillage (117.3 ± 24.8 worms/m2) than under rotary harrowing (340.0 ± 87.4 worms/m2) and grubbing (242.7 ± 43.9 worms/m2). Time since tillage significantly increased earthworm densities or biomass, and affected soil moisture and temperature. Across sampling dates, earthworm densities correlated positively with soil moisture and negatively with soil temperature; individual earthworm mass increased with increasing time since tillage. It was concluded that reduced tillage in vineyards has little impact on earthworms when applied in spring under dry soil conditions.
Suggested Citation
Florian FABER & Elisabeth WACHTER & Johann G. ZALLER, 2017.
"Earthworms are little affected by reduced soil tillage methods in vineyards,"
Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(6), pages 257-263.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:63:y:2017:i:6:id:160-2017-pse
DOI: 10.17221/160/2017-PSE
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:63:y:2017:i:6:id:160-2017-pse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.