IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpse/v63y2017i1id403-2016-pse.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil respiration and net ecosystem production under different tillage practices in semi-arid Northwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Shirley LAMPTEY

    (Gansu Provincial Key Lab of Arid Land Crop Science, Lanzhou, P.R. China
    College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, P.R. China)

  • Lingling LI

    (Gansu Provincial Key Lab of Arid Land Crop Science, Lanzhou, P.R. China
    College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, P.R. China)

  • Junhong XIE

    (Gansu Provincial Key Lab of Arid Land Crop Science, Lanzhou, P.R. China
    College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, P.R. China)

  • Renzhi ZHANG

    (Gansu Provincial Key Lab of Arid Land Crop Science, Lanzhou, P.R. China
    College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University)

  • Zhuzhu LUO

    (Gansu Provincial Key Lab of Arid Land Crop Science, Lanzhou, P.R. China
    College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University)

  • Liqun CAI

    (Gansu Provincial Key Lab of Arid Land Crop Science, Lanzhou, P.R. China
    College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University)

  • Jie LIU

    (Gansu Provincial Key Lab of Arid Land Crop Science, Lanzhou, P.R. China
    College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, P.R. China)

Abstract

In semi-arid areas, increasing CO2 emissions are threatening agricultural sustainability. It is unclear whether different tillage practices without residue returned could help alleviate these issues while increasing crop productivity. This study aimed to quantify soil respiration under conventional tillage (CT); rotary tillage (RT); subsoiling (SS) and no-till (NT), all without residue returned in the Western Loess Plateau. The results showed that SS and NT significantly decreased soil respiration compared to CT, but the effects of SS was the greatest. As a result, SS decreased carbon emission by 22% in 2014 and 19% in 2015 versus CT. The trends of net ecosystem production under different tillage systems were as follows: CT > RT > NT > SS. No-till increased net ecosystem production by 33% in 2014 and 12% in 2015 relative to CT. The SS treatment increased average grain yield by 27% and 23% over CT and RT, and enhanced water use efficiency by an average of 43%. On average, SS increased carbon emission efficiency by 60% and 43% compared to CT and RT, respectively. Thus, subsoiling management strategy is a promising option for the development of sustainable agriculture in semi-arid areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirley LAMPTEY & Lingling LI & Junhong XIE & Renzhi ZHANG & Zhuzhu LUO & Liqun CAI & Jie LIU, 2017. "Soil respiration and net ecosystem production under different tillage practices in semi-arid Northwest China," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(1), pages 14-21.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:63:y:2017:i:1:id:403-2016-pse
    DOI: 10.17221/403/2016-PSE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/403/2016-PSE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/403/2016-PSE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/403/2016-PSE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. E. Essel & Lingling Li & Chaochao Deng & Junhong Xie & Renzhi Zhang & Zhuzhu Luo & Liqun Cai, 2017. "Effect of Conservational and Conventional Tillage Systems on Functional Soil Archaea Diversity in Wheat-Pea Rotation Field," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(11), pages 1-34, October.
    2. Jolanta BOJARSZCZUK & Jerzy KSIĘŻAK & Anna GAŁĄZKA, 2017. "Soil respiration depending on different agricultural practices before maize sowing," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(10), pages 435-441.
    3. Shirley LAMPTEY & Lingling LI & Junhong XIE, 2018. "Impact of nitrogen fertilization on soil respiration and net ecosystem production in maize," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(8), pages 353-360.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:63:y:2017:i:1:id:403-2016-pse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.