IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpse/v51y2005i9id3604-pse.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The implication of seed treatment of winter oilseed rape

Author

Listed:
  • J. Kazda

    (Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Czech Republic)

  • P. Baranyk

    (Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Czech Republic)

  • D. Nerad

    (Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Small plot trials studying the impact of different seed treatments on the occurrence of pests and diseases in autumn were carried out during 2000-2003. The aim was to verify the efficiency of different fungicidal and insecticidal oilseed rape seed treatments and to determine the economical effectiveness of this method of protection. The following insecticidal seed treatments were used: Promet 400 CS (furathiocarb), Cosmos 500 FS (fipronil), Chinook 200 FS (imidacloprid & beta-cyfluthrin) and Marshal ST (carbosulfan). The seed treatment Chinook 200 FS in combination with newly developed fungicidal compound was also assessed. The most effective treatment was Chinook 200 FS (imidacloprid & beta-cyfluthrin), particularly against flea beetles (Phyllotreta spp.), and lower infestations by larvae of the turnip gall weevil (Ceutorhynchus pleurostigma Marsh.) were also found. However, the efficiency lasts no more than 4-5 weeks after sowing. The use of common insecticidal treatments in cases of necessity was found to be beneficial. Plant density in autumn and in spring was greatest in the Chinook 200 FS treatment and in some years a positive influence on yield was also observed with this treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Kazda & P. Baranyk & D. Nerad, 2005. "The implication of seed treatment of winter oilseed rape," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(9), pages 403-409.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:51:y:2005:i:9:id:3604-pse
    DOI: 10.17221/3604-PSE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3604-PSE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3604-PSE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/3604-PSE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:51:y:2005:i:9:id:3604-pse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.