IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpse/v48y2002i11id4403-pse.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes of botanical composition of grass stands under different types of management

Author

Listed:
  • J. Šantrůček

    (Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Czech Republic)

  • M. Svobodová

    (Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Czech Republic)

  • V. Brant

    (Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

A field trial with Bromus catharticus Vahl. cv. Tacit, Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) P. Beauv. ex J.S. et K.B. Presl cv. Median, Festuca pratensis Huds. cv. Otava and Dactylis aschersoniana Graebn. cv. Tosca sown in rows 125 mm, was established in the year 1996 in Prague (chernozem, altitude 281 m a.s.l., average precipitation 472 mm per year, average year temperature 9.3°C). The stands were cut one or three times per year. The mass was removed or once or twice mulched. The share of the botanical species (by weight method), number of present species and agrobotanical groups (grasses, legumes, other dicotyledonous) coverage were measured from the third to the sixth year of vegetation. The results were evaluated by the analysis of variance (Tukey α = 0.05) and by time series analysis (forecasting) by the Statgraphics Plus programme, version 4.0. The species number increased rapidly with the three times cut variant during the four years, from 4 to 25 species, under the other management it was in average from 7 to 14 species, in the sixth year. The highest share of the sown species with the lowest reduction during the years was at Arrhenatherum elatius (41-72% in the sixth year). Bromus catharticus was extinct in the fifth year. The species chosen had a higher importance for conserving of the original botanical composition than the way of harvest. There was the significantly lower ground cover with the variant one cut per year (on average less than 70%). Mulch covered 15-64% of the surface in dependence on the dry mass yield and mulching frequency. The plants coverage was highest on the two or three times harvested variants (75-80%D).

Suggested Citation

  • J. Šantrůček & M. Svobodová & V. Brant, 2002. "Changes of botanical composition of grass stands under different types of management," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 48(11), pages 499-504.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:48:y:2002:i:11:id:4403-pse
    DOI: 10.17221/4403-PSE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4403-PSE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4403-PSE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/4403-PSE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Růžková & L. Růžek & K. Voříšek, 2008. "Soil biological activity of mulching and cut/harvested land set aside," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(5), pages 204-211.
    2. D. Zableckiené & B. Butkuté, 2005. "Conservation effects on the botanical composition of grass swards in the hilly soils of West Lithuania," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(3), pages 137-143.
    3. M. Nováková & K. Voříšek, 2006. "Microbiological parameters of soil set aside before and after desiccation," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(3), pages 97-104.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:48:y:2002:i:11:id:4403-pse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.