IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpps/v57y2021i4id29-2021-pps.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of sprayer parameters and wind speed on spray retention and soil deposits of pesticides: Case of artichoke cultivar

Author

Listed:
  • Hassouna Bahrouni

    (National Research Institute for Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry, University of Carthage, Ariana, Tunisia)

  • Hanene Chaabane

    (National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia, Tunis, Tunisia)

  • Nidhal Marzougui

    (National Research Institute for Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry, University of Carthage, Ariana, Tunisia)

  • Sana Ben Meriem

    (National Research Institute for Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry, University of Carthage, Ariana, Tunisia)

  • Houcine Bchini

    (National Institute for Agricultural Research of Tunisia, University of Carthage, Tunis, Tunisia)

  • Mohamed Ali Ben Abdallah

    (National Research Institute for Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry, University of Carthage, Ariana, Tunisia)

Abstract

Irrational use of chemical method for crop protection, presents increasingly serious risks for human health and the environment. Droplet size and meteorological parameters are key factors to both environmental contamination and pest control efficacy. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of the nozzle use parameters, the operating pressure and the wind speed on droplet foliage deposition (retention) and soil deposition (losses), when treating artichoke. Several combinations were tested in a wind tunnel and in the field, under Mediterranean microclimatic conditions, using a fluorescent dye as a substitute for pesticide. Multiple regression models were built from tunnel data to predict foliage deposition and soil deposits, with determination coefficients of 0.96. Thus, models are able to simulate pesticide deposition on artichoke leaves and soil deposition, depending on sprayer parameters and wind speed. Foliage deposition and soil deposits rates ranged from 30 to 52% and 26 to 57% respectively for anti-drift nozzle. For conventional nozzle, rates varied from 20 to 38% and 31 to 62%. To improve retention and reduce spray losses, it is recommended to choose a medium droplet size when using an anti-drift nozzle, in conjunction with medium nozzle size, medium pressure and reduced wind speed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassouna Bahrouni & Hanene Chaabane & Nidhal Marzougui & Sana Ben Meriem & Houcine Bchini & Mohamed Ali Ben Abdallah, 2021. "Effect of sprayer parameters and wind speed on spray retention and soil deposits of pesticides: Case of artichoke cultivar," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(4), pages 333-343.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:57:y:2021:i:4:id:29-2021-pps
    DOI: 10.17221/29/2021-PPS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/29/2021-PPS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/29/2021-PPS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/29/2021-PPS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beata Cieniawska & Katarzyna Pentoś & Piotr Komarnicki & Jasper Tembeck Mbah & Maciej Samelski & Marek Barć, 2024. "Optimisation of the Spraying Process of Strawberries under Varying Operational Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:57:y:2021:i:4:id:29-2021-pps. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.