IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpps/v51y2015i1id71-2014-pps.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy and limitations of phosphine "spot-fumigation" against five Coleoptera species of stored product pests in wheat in a grain store - short note

Author

Listed:
  • Radek AULICKY

    (Department of Stored Pest Control and Food Safety, Division of Crop Management System, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Vaclav STEJSKAL

    (Department of Stored Pest Control and Food Safety, Division of Crop Management System, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Field validation of spot-fumigation with phosphine (PH3) applied by a subcontracted pest-control company in a farm grain store infested by pests was conducted. Inside and outside of the fumigated grain spot, containers with adults of 5 species of coleopteran stored-product pests were regularly spaced. The beetle pests were the internally feeding Sitophilus granarius and Rhyzopertha dominica, and the externally feeding Tribolium castaneum, Oryzaephilus surinamensis, and Cryptolestes ferrugineus. A 100% mortality of all pest species inside the fumigated spot under the sheet used for the application was stated. The efficacy (maximal) sharply declined with the increasing distance from the fumigated spot: 50% mortality was observed at 5 m from the spot, 38% mortality at 10 m, and a mortality of 23% was observed at 15 m. Mortality was different among the species, and the most sensitive was O. surinamensis, whereas the most tolerant were S. granarius, R. dominica, and T. castaneum. Although an efficient fumigation within the spot was found, the efficacy was low in the grains surrounding the spot. The practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Radek AULICKY & Vaclav STEJSKAL, 2015. "Efficacy and limitations of phosphine "spot-fumigation" against five Coleoptera species of stored product pests in wheat in a grain store - short note," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(1), pages 33-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:51:y:2015:i:1:id:71-2014-pps
    DOI: 10.17221/71/2014-PPS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/71/2014-PPS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/71/2014-PPS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/71/2014-PPS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vaclav STEJSKAL & Radek AULICKY & Zuzana KUCEROVA, 2014. "Pest control strategies and damage potential of seed-infesting pests in the Czech stores - a review," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 165-173.
    2. V. Stejskal & J. Hubert & Z. Kučerová & Z. Munzbergová & J. Lukáš & E. Žďárková, 2003. "The influence of the type of storage on pest infestation of stored grain in the Czech Republic," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(2), pages 55-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radek AULICKY & Vaclav STEJSKAL & Milan DLOUHY & Jana LISKOVA, 2015. "Validation of hydrogen cyanide fumigation in flourmills to control the confused flour beetle," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 33(2), pages 174-179.
    2. Dahou Moutassem & Yuva Bellik & Mohamed El Hadi Sannef, 2021. "Toxicity and repellent activities of Thymus pallescens and Cymbopogon citratus essential oils against Sitophylus granarius," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(4), pages 297-309.
    3. Radek Aulicky & Vlastimil Kolar & Jan Plachy & Vaclav Stejskal, 2017. "Field efficacy of brief exposure of adults of six storage pests to nitrogen-controlled atmospheres," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 169-176.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vaclav STEJSKAL & Radek AULICKY & Zuzana KUCEROVA, 2014. "Pest control strategies and damage potential of seed-infesting pests in the Czech stores - a review," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 165-173.
    2. Václav Stejskal & Zuzana Kučerová & Jiří Háva, 2005. "Trogoderma longisetosum and Trogoderma variabile (Coleoptera, Dermestidae) as two new stored product pests for the Czech Republic," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 41(1), pages 42-45.
    3. Zuzana Kučerová & Karel Kýhos & Radek Aulický & Václav Stejskal, 2013. "Low-pressure treatment to control food-infesting pests (Tribolium castaneum, Sitophilus granarius) using a vacuum packing machine," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 31(1), pages 94-98.
    4. Radek Aulicky & Vaclav Stejskal & Zuzana KuCerova & Pascale Trematerra, 2016. "Trapping of internal and external feeding stored grain beetle pests with two types of pitfall traps: a two-year field study," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(1), pages 45-53.
    5. Jan Hubert & Marie Němcová & Gamila Aspaly & Václav Stejskal, 2006. "The toxicity of bean flour (Phaseolus vulgaris) to stored-product mites (Acari: Acaridida)," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 42(4), pages 125-129.
    6. Václav STEJSKAL & Alois HONĚK, 2015. "Is species diversity of various crop "pest taxa" proportionate to efforts paid to their research? A scientometric analysis in the Czech Republic - short note," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 191-194.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:51:y:2015:i:1:id:71-2014-pps. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.