IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlhor/v31y2004i3id3799-hortsci.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Orchard performance of two plum cultivars on some clonal rootstocks

Author

Listed:
  • J. Kosina

    (Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology, Holovousy, Czech Republic)

Abstract

A plum rootstock trial with Stanley and Cacanska najbolja cvs. was established in spring 1992. The following rootstocks were assessed: MY-BO-1, Myrobalan SE 4043 (both Prunus cerasifera), MY-KL-A (P. cerasifera × P. cerasifera var. atropurpurea), Marunke SE 4034 (Ackerman), St. Julien A, Brompton, GF 655/2, GF 1869, GF 1380, GF 43, Damascena SE 4045, Pixy and Myrobalan seedling. Yields, trunk cross-section area, number of suckers and mean fruit weights were evaluated in the orchard in 1993-2003. There were statistically significant differences in trunk cross-section area, yield and yield efficiency between the tested rootstocks. Trees of Stanley were the most vigorous on MY-KL-A, followed by GF 43, GF 1380 and Myrobalan seedling. The weakest growth was recorded on trees grafted on Pixy, then on GF 655/2 and MY-BO-1. With Cacanska najbolja the growth was the strongest on GF 43, followed by Myrobalan seedling, MY-KL-A and Myrobalan SE 4043. The most compact trees were on Pixy and then on GF 655/2 and Marunke SE 4034. The total accumulated yield per tree was the highest with Stanley on MY-KL-A, followed by Brompton and St. Julien A. The cultivar Cacanska najbolja was most productive on Myrobalan SE 4043 and also on St. Julien A. The yield efficiency with both cultivars was the highest on GF 655/2, and the lowest one on GF 1380 (Stanley) or on Myrobalan seedling (Cacanska najbolja). No statistically significant differences between the tested rootstocks were found in fruit size. Suckers were the most prolific on GF 1869, followed by GF 655/2 and Marunke SE 4034. Based on the hitherto experience, the best rootstocks for Stanley seem to be MY-KL-A and MY-BO-1 and for Cacanska najbolja Myrobalan SE 4043 and St. Julien A.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Kosina, 2004. "Orchard performance of two plum cultivars on some clonal rootstocks," Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 31(3), pages 93-95.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:31:y:2004:i:3:id:3799-hortsci
    DOI: 10.17221/3799-HORTSCI
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hortsci.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3799-HORTSCI.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://hortsci.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3799-HORTSCI.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/3799-HORTSCI?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. Blažek & I. Pištěková, 2012. "Final evaluation of nine plum cultivars grafted onto two rootstocks in a trial established in 1998 at Holovousy," Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 39(3), pages 108-115.
    2. M. Mészáros & J. Kosina & L. Laňar & J. Náměstek, 2015. "Long-term evaluation of growth and yield of Stanley and Cacanska lepotica plum cultivars on selected rootstocks," Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 42(1), pages 22-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:31:y:2004:i:3:id:3799-hortsci. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.