IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v69y2024i6id42-2024-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study on the large-scale intensive culture of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae: Evaluation of two different live exogenous food options

Author

Listed:
  • Václav Kučera

    (Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of the Waters, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Tomáš Pěnka

    (Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of the Waters, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Oleksandr Malinovskyi

    (Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of the Waters, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Carlos Yanes-Roca

    (Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of the Waters, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Zhaxygali B. Kuanchaleyev

    (Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • Tomáš Policar

    (Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of the Waters, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This study is focused on the comparison of production efficiency (growth, survival, and development) and economic evaluation of large-scale larvae culture in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) using Artemia (Group A) compared to using rotifers and the subsequent combination of rotifers and Artemia (Group R) as a first exogenous feed following weaning and intensive culture of juveniles. Both experimental groups were stocked with the same initial density (100 pcs per litre) of larvae at 4 days post hatching (DPH). Each group was cultured in triplicate until 65 DPH. Assessed parameters included FBW (final body weight), FTL (final total length), SGR (specific growth rate), SR (survival rate), CR (cannibalism rate), SBI (swim bladder inflation rate), and TDR (total deformity rate). Production costs were confronted with total number of all produced and high-quality juveniles to determine the cost per one juvenile. Juveniles in Group A displayed more rapid growth (significantly higher FBW, FTL and SGR). On the other hand, parameters concerning quality of the fish (SBI, SR, Share of high quality juveniles and TDR) were significantly higher in Group R. Statistical difference in CR also benefits Group R. Production of bigger share of high-quality juveniles in Group R decreased overall production cost per one high-quality juvenile by 59.7%, from 0.72 EUR in Group A to 0.29 EUR in Group R. Use of established feeding protocols confirmed significant production and economic improvements in pikeperch larvae culture and production of high-quality juveniles. Even though the price of rotifer cultivation significantly exceeded the price of Artemia purchase and cultivation, the production cost of high-quality pikeperch juveniles significantly decreased.

Suggested Citation

  • Václav Kučera & Tomáš Pěnka & Oleksandr Malinovskyi & Carlos Yanes-Roca & Zhaxygali B. Kuanchaleyev & Tomáš Policar, 2024. "Comparative study on the large-scale intensive culture of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae: Evaluation of two different live exogenous food options," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(6), pages 243-254.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:69:y:2024:i:6:id:42-2024-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/42/2024-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/42/2024-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/42/2024-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/42/2024-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomáš Pěnka & Oleksandr Malinovskyi & Jiří Křišťan & Aiman Imentai & Tomáš Policar, 2021. "Effect of density and mixed culture of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) and pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) on growth, survival and feed conversion rate in intensive culture," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(10), pages 428-440.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomáš Pěnka & Oleksandr Malinovskyi & Jitka Kolářová & Václav Kučera & Tomáš Policar, 2024. "Influence of daily feed ration on growth and condition of juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) reared in a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS)," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(6), pages 230-242.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Artemia; economy; larvae; RAS; rotifers;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:69:y:2024:i:6:id:42-2024-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.