IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v67y2022i7id91-2022-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carcass characteristics and breast meat quality in fast-, medium- and slow-growing chickens

Author

Listed:
  • Jaroslav Valenta
  • Darina Chodová

    (Department of Animal Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Eva Tůmová

    (Department of Animal Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Mohamed Ketta

    (Department of Animal Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare carcass characteristics and meat quality of fast- (Ross 308), medium- (Hubbard JA757) and slow-growing (ISA Dual) chickens (n = 1 980). When the chickens reached an average live weight of 2 kg, 40 birds (males to females, 1 : 1) of each genotype were randomly selected and slaughtered for carcass analysis. Pectoralis major (PM) muscle samples were taken to determine the physical and chemical parameters of the meat quality. The fast- and medium-growing genotypes had higher (+3.24% and +3.84%, respectively) dressing out percentages than the slow-growing chickens. As expected, the breast percentage significantly decreased in the order of fast growth > medium growth > slow growth. The abdominal fat percentage was the lowest in Ross 308 chickens, but the abdominal fat percentage in JA757 and ISA Dual chickens did not differ. For edible organs, fast- and medium-growing chickens had heavier hearts and livers than slow-growing chickens. In contrast, ISA Dual chickens showed heavier gizzards. Genotype dramatically affected the chemical composition of PM muscle. The ISA Dual chickens exhibited a significantly higher proportion of dry matter and protein and lower ether extract and cholesterol content than Ross 308 chickens, with intermediate values for JA757 chickens. The ISA Dual group had a lower ash content than Ross 308 and JA757 groups. In terms of physical parameters, the ISA Dual chickens had higher lightness and yellowness and lower redness, pH 24, and cooking loss than those of the other genotypes. Concerning all genotypes, the shear force values increased from fast- to slow-growing chickens. In conclusion, this study found a difference between the genotypes. Although the slow-growing chickens showed the lowest dressing out and breast percentages compared with the other genotypes, the breast meat of the slow-growing chickens had more favourable nutritional properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaroslav Valenta & Darina Chodová & Eva Tůmová & Mohamed Ketta, 2022. "Carcass characteristics and breast meat quality in fast-, medium- and slow-growing chickens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(7), pages 286-294.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:67:y:2022:i:7:id:91-2022-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/91/2022-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/91/2022-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/91/2022-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/91/2022-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teodora Popova & Evgeni Petkov & Krasimir Dimov & Desislava Vlahova-Vangelova & Nikolay Kolev & Desislav Balev & Stefan Dragoev & Maya Ignatova, 2024. "Performance, Carcass Composition, and Meat Quality during Frozen Storage in Male Layer-Type Chickens," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:67:y:2022:i:7:id:91-2022-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.