Author
Listed:
- Alessandra Alves Silva
(Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil)
- Fabyano Fonseca Silva
(Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil)
- Delvan Alves Silva
(Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil)
- Hugo Teixeira Silva
(Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil)
- Cláudio Napolis Costa
(Embrapa Dairy Cattle, Juiz de Fora, Brazil)
- Paulo Sávio Lopes
(Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil)
- Renata Veroneze
(Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil)
- Gertrude Thompson
(Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources (CIBIO-InBio), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal)
- Julio Carvalheira
(Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources (CIBIO-InBio), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal)
Abstract
Although several studies have investigated the factors affecting imputation accuracy, most of these studies involved a large number of genotyped animals. Thus, results from these studies cannot be directly applied to small populations, since the population structure affects imputation accuracy. In addition, factors affecting imputation accuracy may also be intensified in small populations. Therefore, we aimed to compare different imputation strategies for the Portuguese Holstein cattle population considering several commercially available single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels in a relatively small number of genotyped animals. Data from 1359 genotyped animals were used to evaluate imputation in 7 different scenarios. In the S1 to S6 scenarios, imputations were performed from LDv1, 50Kv1, 57K, 77K, HDv3 and Ax58K panels to 50Kv2 panel. In these scenarios, the bulls in 50Kv2 were divided into reference (352) and validation (101) populations based on the year of birth. In the S7 scenario, the validation population consisted of 566 cows genotyped with the Ax58K panel with their genotypes masked to LDv1. In general, all sample imputation accuracies were high with correlations ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 and concordance rate ranging from 92.59 to 98.18%. SNP-specific accuracy was consistent with that of sample imputation. S4 (40.32% of SNPs imputed) had higher accuracy than S2 and S3, both with less than 7.59% of SNPs imputed. Most probably, this was due to the high number of imputed SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.05 in S2 and S3 (by 18.43% and 16.06% higher than in S4, respectively). Therefore, for these two scenarios, MAF was more relevant than the panel density. These results suggest that genotype imputation using several commercially available SNP panels is feasible for the Portuguese national genomic evaluation.
Suggested Citation
Alessandra Alves Silva & Fabyano Fonseca Silva & Delvan Alves Silva & Hugo Teixeira Silva & Cláudio Napolis Costa & Paulo Sávio Lopes & Renata Veroneze & Gertrude Thompson & Julio Carvalheira, 2019.
"Genotype imputation strategies for Portuguese Holstein cattle using different SNP panels,"
Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(9), pages 377-386.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:64:y:2019:i:9:id:120-2019-cjas
DOI: 10.17221/120/2019-CJAS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Nina Moravčíková & Radovan Kasarda & Luboš Vostrý & Zuzana Krupová & Emil Krupa & Kristína Lehocká & Barbora Olšanská & Anna Trakovická & Rudolf Nádaský & Radoslav Židek & Ľubomír Belej & Jozef Golian, 2019.
"Analysis of selection signatures in the beef cattle genome,"
Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(12), pages 491-503.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:64:y:2019:i:9:id:120-2019-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.