Author
Listed:
- J. Šichtař
(Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- R. Tolman
(Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- R. Rajmon
(Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- P. Klabanová
(Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- P. Berka
(Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- J. Volek
(Research Institute of Animal Production, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic)
Abstract
Differences in follicular development and repeatability of follicular growth pattern among Czech Fleckvieh (n = 20) and Holstein (n = 23) heifers were investigated. Follicular dynamics was evaluated by daily sonographic scanning during three interovulatory intervals. The mean duration of the interovulatory interval was 20.66 ± 0.32 days, no differences between breeds were observed. The proportion of the non-alterna-ting pattern was nearly the same as that of the alternating pattern (54% and 46%, respectively). The majority of IOIs ≤ 21 days were of the 2-wave pattern (71%) whereas only 29% of them were of the 3-wave pattern. Conversely, the majority of IOIs ≥ 22 days were of the 3-wave pattern (84%), whereas only 16% were of the 2-wave pattern. Differences could be observed in the Czech Fleckvieh heifers. Comparing 2- and 3-wave interovulatory intervals, 44.2% of the heifers exhibited 3 waves and 55.8% of the heifers exhibited 2 waves of follicular growth. The ratio of 3- to 2-wave heifers was about the same in the Holstein breed; in Czech Fleckvieh 2-wave cycles slightly dominated (11/12, 8/12; respectively). In Holstein heifers, the first follicular wave occurred 0.92 ± 0.15 days after ovulation in 2-wave interovulatory intervals, and the emergence of the first wave in 2-wave Czech Fleckvieh heifers appeared later (P < 0.05), 1.83 ± 0.3 days after ovulation. The maximal size reached by the dominant follicles in all animals and in the Czech Fleckvieh differed in the first and in the second wave of 2-wave cycles (P < 0.05). In 3-wave interovulatory intervals the dominant follicles in the second wave differed (P < 0.05) from the mean diameters of the first and the third wave in the Czech Fleckvieh. The ovulatory follicles were significantly (P < 0.05) smaller in 2-wave than in 3-wave interovulatory intervals among all animals and between the Holstein and Czech Fleckvieh heifers. In conclusion, we found a similar pattern of ovarian follicular dynamics in Czech Fleckvieh and Holstein heifers kept under identical nutritional and environmental conditions. Whether the significant difference in the emergence of the 1st fol-licular wave in 2-wave IOIs between C and H heifers is of real biological significance is ambiguous.
Suggested Citation
J. Šichtař & R. Tolman & R. Rajmon & P. Klabanová & P. Berka & J. Volek, 2010.
"A comparison of the follicular dynamics in heifers of the Czech Fleckvieh and Holstein breeds,"
Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(6), pages 234-242.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:55:y:2010:i:6:id:242-2009-cjas
DOI: 10.17221/242/2009-CJAS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:55:y:2010:i:6:id:242-2009-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.